VectorVictor
Donor
Read the EULA for Sony--those things you're holding against Microsoft for backtracking on are in the current Sony PS4 EULA, including the ability for restriction of used software and requisite always-on network access for the system.Judging by the few games that are out, the roles seem to have reversed from last gen. PS4 seems to be more capable performance wise as many of it's games out of the box run at the more intensive 1080p vs the same games Xbox runs at last gen's 720p. Maybe they still need to optimize better, but the specs this time are in PS4s favor. Personally I only play sport games on consoles and the rest on a PC so usually it's not a big deal to me, however going to get a PS4 since Microsoft tried to pull all that nasty BS before they back paddled after the community ripped them a new one. Have to stand up for something sometimes other then a beer.
Not saying that it's going to happen, but if there was zero intention of this happening as Sony claims, why bury it in the EULA?
Agreed. This gen will come down to exclusives and first party titles. I think that's why Microsoft had no fewer than three quality retail exclusives at launch, and another one (Titanfall) waiting for March.XB1 is pretty damn good. If this is what the PS4 is like, then there really isn't a console that is better. They are both good options.
---
Also, to correct another poster, XBox Live and PlayStation Plus are the same retail price $49.99/year, and both systems require online subscriptions for gameplay.
But frankly, if you pay more than $35/year for either or...you're not doing it right. Both are routinely on sale throughout the year, are stackable, and just recently were $25/yr each during Black Friday.
Last edited by a moderator: