Mavric
Yoda
Or notEvery decision made on any topic costs lives at some level. That is a red herring.That is an interesting table, even just from an historical timeline perspective.
It does beg the question: what happens if we stay on the current path?
That's important because "massive action to limit emissions" will cost human lives in developing (and even developed) nations.
NASA Study Finds There Was No "Pause" In Climate ChangeSo we're warmer now than we were during the last ice age? Is that supposed to be a bad thing?And I'm pretty sure most reading have show slower/leveled warming over the last 15 years or so. Why does his graph have a spike?The study, published in Science, observed two decades of data and found that the Earths extra heat was being redistributed by the worlds largest oceans. Researchers found that cooling in the top 100-meter layer of the Pacific Ocean was mainly compensated by warming in the 100- to 300-meter layer of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.
Our findings support the idea that the Indo-Pacific interaction in the upper-level water (0300 m depth) regulated global surface temperature over the past two decades and can fully account for the recently observed hiatus, researchers wrote in the paper.http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/earthmatters/2015/06/05/parsing-the-details-of-the-warming-hiatus/![]()
LinkThe cold waters of Earth’s deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years.
Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from 2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably.
Last edited by a moderator: