Alabama Possibly looking at sanctions?

The "south division" was also added to that lettering. We are well aware we did not win the conf championship game.

The way the Football Championships are awarded is both division champions are crowned "regular season" champions and the conf champ game winner is the "post-season (or tournament) champion"

 
AgMarauder04 said:
The "south division" was also added to that lettering. We are well aware we did not win the conf championship game.

The way the Football Championships are awarded is both division champions are crowned "regular season" champions and the conf champ game winner is the "post-season (or tournament) champion"
Click to expand...
I know. You should still be embarrassed. I don't get to excited about us showing up to conference championship games and losing. Just my $.02. Carry on.

 
AgMarauder04 said:
http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

What's the issue?

That picture was taken before the "south division" was added to the 2010 conference championship year...which is claimed as a co-champion. All claims are factual.
Click to expand...
1919 - Wonder why Notre Dame doesn't claim the 1919 National Championship. I guess A&M has more in common with Harvard and Illinois, football-wise.

1927 - So a "National Championship" awarded by a computer program 50 years later? Really? Whatever you need to fill up a wall I guess.

 
Mavric said:
AgMarauder04 said:
http://en.wikipedia....football_season http://en.wikipedia....football_season http://en.wikipedia....football_season What's the issue? That picture was taken before the "south division" was added to the 2010 conference championship year...which is claimed as a co-champion. All claims are factual.
Click to expand...
1919 - Wonder why Notre Dame doesn't claim the 1919 National Championship. I guess A&M has more in common with Harvard and Illinois, football-wise. 1927 - So a "National Championship" awarded by a computer program 50 years later? Really? Whatever you need to fill up a wall I guess.
Click to expand...
Considering a major "decidiing" body still recognized A&M, it's perfectly reasonable.

 
Ulty said:
QMany said:
AgMarauder04 said:
QMany said:
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Click to expand...
Really? I think that's a reach.
Click to expand...
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
Click to expand...
If you are talking to someone about which championships belong in the record books, you may need to choose a different dance partner than an A&M fan.
default_eek3dance.gif


Click to expand...
i wonder what memorial stadium would like like if nebraska would follow the aggie trend?

 
All it took was 12 posts to derai lthe thread to discussing if Bama was going to be sanctioned to re-opening the dastardly championships on the wall debate.

 
The last 4 year National Championship winners

2012 Alabama - vacated

2011 Alabama - vacated

2010 Auburn - vacated

2009 Alabama - vacated

$EC $EC $EC $EC $EC $EC

 
AgMarauder04 said:
Ulty said:
QMany said:
AgMarauder04 said:
QMany said:
Take away that '12 ship. Now the Nebraska v. Bama dynasty debate isn't even close.
Click to expand...
Really? I think that's a reach.
Click to expand...
You take away the 2012 National Championship and Alabama has 2 within 4 years, or 3 withing 5 years if they make it through their "brutual SEC schedule" this year. I don't think that is a reach at all. The debate was very close with both having 3 within 4 years. If you take one away, it isn't even debatable.
Click to expand...
If you are talking to someone about which championships belong in the record books, you may need to choose a different dance partner than an A&M fan.
default_eek3dance.gif
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

http://en.wikipedia....football_season

What's the issue?

That picture was taken before the "south division" was added to the 2010 conference championship year...which is claimed as a co-champion. All claims are factual.
Click to expand...

2010 co-champion? Wasn't it Nebraska and Oklahoma in the Conference title that year? Or am I missing something big? It is late on a Fri night, so my brain cells might be alittle dizzy.

 
A&M split the South with OU and one other team. All were considered co-champions because of the matching 6-2 B12 records, but due to the BCS rules, OU won the tie breaker to head to the CCG.

 
Back
Top