That's a false equivalency.There was a 500 and two sub 500 seasons in there. We can quibble about how bad bad can be I guess but three plus losses every year since 2001 when it used to be unheard of was enough for the schools you mentioned and it should be here as well.
You get all frothy whenever someone doesn't want him immediately fired, so maybe we should find a different metric.Right, which is why I get so persnickety when the "Bo resurrected this program from the ashes" line gets trotted out.
No.You get all frothy whenever someone doesn't want him immediately fired, so maybe we should find a different metric.Right, which is why I get so persnickety when the "Bo resurrected this program from the ashes" line gets trotted out.
If that's OU they also were on probation. Nebraska isn't.That's a false equivalency.There was a 500 and two sub 500 seasons in there. We can quibble about how bad bad can be I guess but three plus losses every year since 2001 when it used to be unheard of was enough for the schools you mentioned and it should be here as well.
9-4,10-4, 10-4, 9-4, 10-4, 9-4 is not even close to the same as 6-6, 5-5-1, 3-8, 4-8, 5-6.
watNo.You get all frothy whenever someone doesn't want him immediately fired, so maybe we should find a different metric.Right, which is why I get so persnickety when the "Bo resurrected this program from the ashes" line gets trotted out.
You can be a fan of Bo mind want him here. I am not a fans of the depths muddy of truths people scrape up to defend him.
None of those schools made coaching changes without very subpar seasons though. They averaged 6-7 losses (with below .500 seasons) the last 2 years before getting canned.If that's OU they also were on probation. Nebraska isn't.That's a false equivalency.There was a 500 and two sub 500 seasons in there. We can quibble about how bad bad can be I guess but three plus losses every year since 2001 when it used to be unheard of was enough for the schools you mentioned and it should be here as well.
9-4,10-4, 10-4, 9-4, 10-4, 9-4 is not even close to the same as 6-6, 5-5-1, 3-8, 4-8, 5-6.
In USC's down years there was a gigantic Rose Bowl win and a few years they were ranked.
Oh gosh...
THIS AGAIN!
We were actually doing really well without this crap being muddled again. We honestly had about a week of freedom from this.
AND NOW, here we are again.
HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO HAVE THE SAME CONVERSATION ABOUT BO?!?!
"This isn't the same conversation though!"
Yes it is. SHUT UP...
I'm sorry but that is just not truthful, you just like most every other fan of Nebraska, me included, with be hitting the panic button very quickly and calling for BPs head if he had a 7-6 season this year.Actually Schnellenberger was not fired but quit. At the time, he was an alcoholic, drunk as a skunk.ExceptParallel ?
After Switzer ............... Gibbs(fired) - Schnellenberger(fired) - Blake(fired) - Stoops
After Osborne ............. Solich(fired) - Callahan(fired) - Pelini(fired?) - ?????
Fourth time's a charm ????BlackBlake had terrible teams. They had losing records when he was there, not 9-10 win seasons.
To tell you the truth, I was kinda comfortable 7-6 Pelini's record without Bo's embarrassing antics, on and off the field.
the "Callahan disbanded the walk-on program", or the "program was in shambles", etc.
I think Callahan did to extensive damage to the program, and that Bo's early success is a result of him just being that damn good.
That's why I think Callahan did more damage to the fan base, than he did to the actual football program - especially in regards to wins/losses. I'd say Bo's early success proves that.
so he's so damn good that he can take a program in shambles and still win, but 6 years later he hasn't made it any farther along that "process"?I think Callahan did to extensive damage to the program, and that Bo's early success is a result of him just being that damn good.That's why I think Callahan did more damage to the fan base, than he did to the actual football program - especially in regards to wins/losses. I'd say Bo's early success proves that.
So he just decided to regress and not keep the talent in stock as an extra challenge then?I think Callahan did to extensive damage to the program, and that Bo's early success is a result of him just being that damn good.That's why I think Callahan did more damage to the fan base, than he did to the actual football program - especially in regards to wins/losses. I'd say Bo's early success proves that.