Gun Control

Junior said:
you obviously will only accept links from websites that you like. So why don't we cut the BS and you can just tell me what websites I'm allowed to cite.

alternatively, you could post your qualms about the data itself, rather than trying to muddy the waters complaining about liberal sources
Click to expand...
I'm still awaiting your response to this; "Of course its analogous. You are exercising your 1st amendment rights in the same way that I exercise my 2nd amendment rights. How would you feel if I came on here and told you to STFU and go get whatever you're saying approved by some federal keyboard jockey before you post it? You cool with that? You don't get to f#cking cherry pick the Constitution!"

Edit: Oh, and you never said if you wanted a beer or not so I got you one anyway but then I drank it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
the right to bear arms has never been Absolute. there has always been restrictions on what kind of arms you can purchase and who can purchase them.if your argument is that anyone can own any type of weapon they want to then you are simply wrong. Therefore it is the government's right to know who is buying what kind of weapons. Free speech is also not absolute. You cannot yell fire in a crowded building. It is not picking and choosing parts of the Constitution to obey and not obey, it is simply the court interpretation of the document.

 
Junior said:
Coach Power'T said:
Junior,

Just what exactly do you want? Guns gone? stricter laws? I didn't want to read all 40 pages of this thing, so I thought I would ask. Sorry if you have explained before.

by the way, I am "pro-gun" including AR's
Click to expand...
As a starting point, I, like most Americans, I would like to see expanded background checks, limits on magazine size, a potentially a renewed effort to ban assault rifles. I'd also like to see the NRA and the right allow the ATF to have a full-time director, and allow them to use modern technology (such as an excel database) to keep track of gun sellers. I'd like to see the ATF be able to demand gun dealers to keep an inventory and a history of who they sell to. Christ we can find out in 10 minutes who purchased sudafed in the last month, but we can't do the same for guns.
Click to expand...
I KNEW I saw you post this at some point. Just couldn't find it because I was looking further back in the thread. Do you even know what an assault rifle is? Go look it up. You have truly shown your ignorance on this topic, in this post and I can't take anything else you say, seriously. Good day, sir.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MidnightRider said:
Junior said:
Coach Power'T said:
Junior,

Just what exactly do you want? Guns gone? stricter laws? I didn't want to read all 40 pages of this thing, so I thought I would ask. Sorry if you have explained before.

by the way, I am "pro-gun" including AR's
Click to expand...
As a starting point, I, like most Americans, I would like to see expanded background checks, limits on magazine size, a potentially a renewed effort to ban assault rifles. I'd also like to see the NRA and the right allow the ATF to have a full-time director, and allow them to use modern technology (such as an excel database) to keep track of gun sellers. I'd like to see the ATF be able to demand gun dealers to keep an inventory and a history of who they sell to. Christ we can find out in 10 minutes who purchased sudafed in the last month, but we can't do the same for guns.
Click to expand...
I KNEW I saw you post this at some point. Just couldn't find it because I was looking further back in the thread. Do you even know what an assault rifle is? Go look it up. You have truly shown your ignorance on this topic, in this post and I can't take anything else you say, seriously. Good day, sir.
Click to expand...
So.... Still nothing to refute that background checks work

 
Junior said:
the right to bear arms has never been Absolute. there has always been restrictions on what kind of arms you can purchase and who can purchase them.if your argument is that anyone can own any type of weapon they want to then you are simply wrong. Therefore it is the government's right to know who is buying what kind of weapons. Free speech is also not absolute. You cannot yell fire in a crowded building. It is not picking and choosing parts of the Constitution to obey and not obey, it is simply the court interpretation of the document.
Click to expand...
"the right to bear arms has never been Absolute. there has always been restrictions on what kind of arms you can purchase and who can purchase them." Never and always? Pretty absolute and pretty inaccurate but pretty entertaining, nonetheless. The rest of your argument is weak sauce. Please keep the laughs coming though.

 
Junior said:
MidnightRider said:
Junior said:
Coach Power'T said:
Junior,

Just what exactly do you want? Guns gone? stricter laws? I didn't want to read all 40 pages of this thing, so I thought I would ask. Sorry if you have explained before.

by the way, I am "pro-gun" including AR's
Click to expand...
As a starting point, I, like most Americans, I would like to see expanded background checks, limits on magazine size, a potentially a renewed effort to ban assault rifles. I'd also like to see the NRA and the right allow the ATF to have a full-time director, and allow them to use modern technology (such as an excel database) to keep track of gun sellers. I'd like to see the ATF be able to demand gun dealers to keep an inventory and a history of who they sell to. Christ we can find out in 10 minutes who purchased sudafed in the last month, but we can't do the same for guns.
Click to expand...
I KNEW I saw you post this at some point. Just couldn't find it because I was looking further back in the thread. Do you even know what an assault rifle is? Go look it up. You have truly shown your ignorance on this topic, in this post and I can't take anything else you say, seriously. Good day, sir.
Click to expand...
So.... Still nothing to refute that background checks work
Click to expand...
Nope, not gonna waste my time. When you can show me that they stopped a mass murder, I'll do further research.

Edit: You've had time to Google it by now, what's an assault rifle? Is it the scary looking black gun that sorta looks like what Army dudes and Marines carry around? Is that it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How the hell can you show something stopped a mass murder? That's like saying your bone almost broke. I mean, it did happen or it didn't. Shrodinger sh#t going on in here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MidnightRider said:
Junior said:
the right to bear arms has never been Absolute. there has always been restrictions on what kind of arms you can purchase and who can purchase them.if your argument is that anyone can own any type of weapon they want to then you are simply wrong. Therefore it is the government's right to know who is buying what kind of weapons. Free speech is also not absolute. You cannot yell fire in a crowded building. It is not picking and choosing parts of the Constitution to obey and not obey, it is simply the court interpretation of the document.
Click to expand...
"the right to bear arms has never been Absolute. there has always been restrictions on what kind of arms you can purchase and who can purchase them." Never and always? Pretty absolute and pretty inaccurate but pretty entertaining, nonetheless. The rest of your argument is weak sauce. Please keep the laughs coming though.
Click to expand...
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/politics/supreme-court-justice-antonin-scalia-bear-arms-unlimited-noted-future-limitations-decided-future-cases-article-1.1124408

Scalia, a card-carrying conservative and stalwart of the Court’s right-leaning majority, told “Fox News Sunday” that the Second Amendment’s language allowing citizens the right to own weapons doesn’t mean they can own any weapon they want.

“There are some limitations that can be imposed,” Scalia said. “What they are will depend on what the society understood were reasonable limitations at the (future) time.”

In a controversial 2008 decision, the Supreme Court declared a handgun ban enacted by the District of Columbia unconstitutional, but the majority noted that, nonetheless, gun ownership was not an unlimited right, said Scalia, who wrote the opinion in that case.

 
Iraq was no gun control. Just imagine, U.S.A. Main St. paraded with dozens of pickups loaded with gun-lover passengers. NRA dreams comes true.

365765_ISIL-militants-Iraq.jpg


NRA members. U.S.A. Main St.

default_insertsarcasm.gif
or not ......

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tschu said:
Haha, some people actually think like this. Amuses me:

1622516_392996144174340_3526012329248032024_o.jpg


Go Patriots! Save us from the tyranny!
Click to expand...
It amuses me that some would go out like the students in the pic on the left. Its pathetic really...

When they kick at your front door

How you gonna come?

With your hands on your head

Or on the trigger of your gun?

Just thought I'd leave you some fodder to get you foaming.
default_steammad.gif


 
Back
Top