HuskerInLostWages
New member
Worst part about this whole thing, next year we will have the same thing again. Does anyone expect any changes? We have a coward of an AD.
He's a coward because he will accept this years play and we will continue down the same road next year. It was pretty straight forward.He's a coward because of next years performance?
WOW again!He's a coward because he will accept this years play and we will continue down the same road next year. It was pretty straight forward.He's a coward because of next years performance?
You already know how he will address the future of this team?He's a coward because he will accept this years play and we will continue down the same road next year. It was pretty straight forward.He's a coward because of next years performance?
I made it one.How didd this become a topic? I replied this to your posting of an OWH article...Weird.
As to Eichorst, he will give us some lip service and back to the status quo.
I agree with your main point but there are so many factual errors in this post I can't even take it seriously.The team has a bad game and our AD is a coward? Lost Wages that really has no traction for an argument.
We played poorly, we played not to the standards of UN football, we played into Wisconsin's hands sure, but players and coaches were involved with it, the AD was anointed by Tom Osborne and he will make the right decision when the occasion calls for it.
A lot of decisions will have to be made because I don't think I've ever seen such a polarizing loss besides the missoula debacle of Callahan. Just don't pull ad Hominem out of your *** about a guy who didn't have anything to do with one game.