Duke is a 50 currently in 15 seasons. If it weren't for a miraculous turn around by Cutcliff and company the last two seasons (19 wins I believe). Duke may have been looking at something similar in 10 years.When you consider Oregon State won 52 games total in the 25 years leading up to the Riley hire, he definitely won consistently there.
BTW that has to be up there for worst run in p5 school history. Averaging 2 wins a year for a quarter century is incredible futility.
While I agree, and it's annoying (I know I've been annoying on multiple occasions after throwing some drinks back). I do appreciate those others that have been coaching on the high school level because even though they don't know what it takes to win on a Div 1 level. They do offer insight different from the casual fan. It's refreshing in my opinion. Just depends on the subject at hand though.+1I could not give a crap less how long you have coached pee wee, Jr All American or High School, your not on the same level, have no real clue of what it takes to be on that level, or you would be.
I agree about letting Mike Riley coach. I'm optimistic myself.We have a new year coming, a new coach, a new excitement from the team it appears.
why not let it run its course. If he can not do the job, plain and simple he will be gone, move on to the next coach.
I think he is the right guy. If you feel Bo was robbed, cheated, treated unfairly and truly like the man, then follow him to Youngstown State, see where that leads.
Way smarter people than any on this board, and I could not give a crap less how long you have coached pee wee, Jr All American or High School, your not on the same level, have no real clue of what it takes to be on that level, or you would be. So tired of hearing how smart some of you are.
Right now ne is Nebraska's greatest coach, because he is the only Nebraska Head Coach. He demands respect for that. Give him the opportunity to win or fail.
This forum is sickening at times. This how many page garbage barrel needs to stop.
His last year they were 8-5, beat Oregon and 2 snaps from being a 10-3 team with a +150 point differential- His only losing season they were 3 snaps away from being 8-3To be clear, Erickson went 11-1 in his second season and then fell back to earth the next two years. Maybe he decided to leave when he realized that he probably couldn't get back their again.
In my opinion, he inherited a pretty stacked team after Koetter was let go, which led to a great first season at ASU. But he really struggled recruiting and I don't think the staff around him was very strong. The team really declined during his tenure, and lost a bunch of games to the UofA which is not acceptable for ASU coaches. He also had some off the field issues (some publicized, some rumored), plus a lame duck AD in Lisa Love. It was all a perfect storm that led to him struggling in Tempe.Any insight on why Dennis Erickson failed at ASU after such a strong start?Hey, no problem at all. The hatred for that school down in Tucson burns deeply within me.![]()
ASU definitely has a lot going for it right now. It is a beautiful campus and has a lot to offer that an incoming freshman could be swayed by. And the team is certainly doing well; Todd Graham is absolutely loved by his players and I can imagine he puts together a good story for recruits. The biggest adjustment will be attending a school with 70,000 plus students; that can be pretty daunting for an 18 year old kid. I know it was for me. Still a bummer to lose a local Nebraska kid, but I wish him well.
Im not so sure the NFL game translates that well to College coachingDennis Erickson was a bit of a nightmare during his run with the San Francisco 49ers, having inherited a decent roster from a better coach, then two seasons later driving them into the ground with an unimaginably bad 2 - 14 season.
Before that he had taken a talented Seattle Seahawks squad and and slowly turned them into under-performers.
jmfb has convinced me that we should have.Does anyone here think we should have hired Dennis Erickson instead of Mike Riley?
I'm not sure, either.Im not so sure the NFL game translates that well to College coachingDennis Erickson was a bit of a nightmare during his run with the San Francisco 49ers, having inherited a decent roster from a better coach, then two seasons later driving them into the ground with an unimaginably bad 2 - 14 season.
Before that he had taken a talented Seattle Seahawks squad and and slowly turned them into under-performers.
If it does, then a really average or below coach (maybe he was) was able to do quite a bit better than Mike Riley at Oregon State
Dude what are you taking about!?!? DIAMOND FORMATION = TOUCHDOWN FORMATION!!!My example is usually when people refer to running the diamond. Thinking it's gunna make the difference in a game. Just because we scored a touchdown 1 time on 1 play, when never showing it before on film. That comment drives me insane, and shows how little that person knows about the game.