Im not so sure the NFL game translates that well to College coachingDennis Erickson was a bit of a nightmare during his run with the San Francisco 49ers, having inherited a decent roster from a better coach, then two seasons later driving them into the ground with an unimaginably bad 2 - 14 season.
Before that he had taken a talented Seattle Seahawks squad and and slowly turned them into under-performers.
jmfb has convinced me that we should have.Does anyone here think we should have hired Dennis Erickson instead of Mike Riley?
I'm not sure, either.Im not so sure the NFL game translates that well to College coachingDennis Erickson was a bit of a nightmare during his run with the San Francisco 49ers, having inherited a decent roster from a better coach, then two seasons later driving them into the ground with an unimaginably bad 2 - 14 season.
Before that he had taken a talented Seattle Seahawks squad and and slowly turned them into under-performers.
If it does, then a really average or below coach (maybe he was) was able to do quite a bit better than Mike Riley at Oregon State
Dude what are you taking about!?!? DIAMOND FORMATION = TOUCHDOWN FORMATION!!!My example is usually when people refer to running the diamond. Thinking it's gunna make the difference in a game. Just because we scored a touchdown 1 time on 1 play, when never showing it before on film. That comment drives me insane, and shows how little that person knows about the game.
That is exactly the path I took to where I'm at now.I was very similar, cg_8! I also recall really hoping we'd somehow get David Shaw. When I first heard the name, it was out of left field. I had no idea who the guy was and felt a tinge of disappointment.
Then I thought I had better go read a little about the guy. And the disappointment quickly turned to elation.
He wasn't the only coach I would have been happy with. But he's exactly the right kind of guy.
You missed the entire point which was slowly and carefully explainedI'm not sure, either.Im not so sure the NFL game translates that well to College coachingDennis Erickson was a bit of a nightmare during his run with the San Francisco 49ers, having inherited a decent roster from a better coach, then two seasons later driving them into the ground with an unimaginably bad 2 - 14 season.
Before that he had taken a talented Seattle Seahawks squad and and slowly turned them into under-performers.
If it does, then a really average or below coach (maybe he was) was able to do quite a bit better than Mike Riley at Oregon State
Which is why I turn to people who have extensive experience in both professional and college football and take note of their consistent and often strong endorsement of Mike Riley's coaching abilities.
Endorsements that were not necessarily extended to Dennis Erickson's long, erratic decline in the coaching ranks.
I am glad someone said it!+1I could not give a crap less how long you have coached pee wee, Jr All American or High School, your not on the same level, have no real clue of what it takes to be on that level, or you would be.
Im not confident a 62 year old coach who hasnt won anything before in College football- will all of a sudden win something or that someone that hasnt consistently won - will consistently win. Especially when an average by most standards coach came right behind him and was able to do so.So, Erickson did good at some places and not good at others. What that tells me is that success at one place doesn't guarantee success at another. Not winning championships at one place doesn't mean he can't do it at another.
This is because every situation is different. Gene Chizik was 5-19 at ISU over two years with his second season being 2-10 with an 0-8 record in the conference. He actually got worse his second year there than his first. He jumps ship to Auburn and two years later he wins an NC.
In 4 years at OSU, Les Miles was 28-21 and the best he had done was 3rd in his division. His bowl record was 1-2. He had a .500 record in conference. He jumps ship to LSU and he wins an NC three years later.
The fact remains that there is a difference in programs and what can be done at those programs. There is a difference between situations coaches are in at various programs.
I will trust the decision making of people who know one hell of a lot more than anyone on an internet message board over if he is the right guy for the job since we have nothing to base anything else on other than speculation.
Had SabAn- not Saben stayed, he would have built a dynasty at MSU, just like he did at LSU and Bama- this again?I didn't realize Miles was the HC at Colorado and Michigan.
If you want past success. Riley won two grey cups actually as a HC. Bo won an NC as a coordinator. Where did that put him as an HC?
Nick Saben was 34-24-1 with his best year being 2nd in the conference and he never won a bowl game at MSU before he went to LSU and won an NC 4 years later.
Dantonio is 75 -31 at MSU with a lot more hardware to show for it. Saben never got them there but a different coach could. I'm guessing Saben is a pretty good coach.
It is your opinion that a 62 year old coach can't get it done here and you are basing that off of what he did at a school with much less to offer recruits than Nebraska.
You're entitled to that opinion but that doesn't make it fact.