Redux
Donor
Don't go blaming osmosis for your stupidity.I feel like I'm getting stupid through osmosis just by responding to your posts. So carry on without me. HANDMike Riley didn't go 9-3 here last year. And we don't know what his record this year will be.You can not use the former coaches last record to compare the new coaches first record, you just can't.Huh? I just explained that improvement in record would keep me on board with Frost. With Riley, we're seeing the opposite. So W/L records are exactly what I'm concerned with.So really, it's more along the lines of you wanting Frost here and not Riley. Records aren't what you are concerned with here.I'd probably lose the bells, but I would probably still be in. Depends a lot on other details to say for sure.Tell me, say we hire Frost at the end of this season. He goes 4-8 in 2016 and 6-6 in 2017.
Are you still all in with bells on?
If Frost comes in next season, that means Riley must've lost out or gone 3-9 at best. So, 4-8 in 2016 would be an improvement and 6-6 would be another improvement. I wouldn't be happy about it, but at least he's not going backwards.
See, a W/L record of 9-3 followed by a 3-9 is not "improvement". The ones outlined in my response are at least small improvements.
Well, I guess you can, but that would be assinine.
HAND
Last edited by a moderator: