ColoNoCoHusker
New member
That correct but here is the DOJ version updated for 2015... https://www.justice.gov/opcl/overview-privacy-act-1974-2015-editionAnother one of the Trump EOs, this one from 25 January:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/presidential-executive-order-enhancing-public-safety-interior-united
'Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States'
I believe this is the Privacy Act in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_Act_of_1974Sec. 13. Office for Victims of Crimes Committed by Removable Aliens. The Secretary shall direct the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to take all appropriate and lawful action to establish within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement an office to provide proactive, timely, adequate, and professional services to victims of crimes committed by removable aliens and the family members of such victims. This office shall provide quarterly reports studying the effects of the victimization by criminal aliens present in the United States.
Sec. 14. Privacy Act. Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information.
The P.I.I. piece alone will have wide-ranging ramifications and end up being costly for lots of citizens. PII exists as part of every financial system as well every audit/industry information standard across numerous markets (HIPAA, FERPA, GLBA, PCI, etc). The direction I have heard so far is the exclusions are expected to be enforced. That is to say a non-citizen with a US credit card, the PII attached to the credit card CANNOT be encrypted without violating this. Similar interpretation to healthcare systems right now. Corporate America will fight this as the financial cost will easily be in the $Billions if this early direction holds.