Douchebag Thread for Politics & Religion Spill Over

[ZRod]

Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.

Where/when did this happen?

I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.

 

[knapplc]

It's an intellectually dishonest position. There's no intent to have a discussion, there's only an intent to win. Any contrary views to Dewitt's opinion is somewhere he "didn't want to go," because he thinks such discussions are "pointless."

You only think that if you have zero intention of changing your mind, or zero thought that you could be wrong. It's cowardly and, unfortunately, heavily indicative of the conservative movement in modern politics.

 

[Apathy]

Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.

Where/when did this happen?

I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.

Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.

 

[Apathy]

It's an intellectually dishonest position. There's no intent to have a discussion, there's only an intent to win. Any contrary views to Dewitt's opinion is somewhere he "didn't want to go," because he thinks such discussions are "pointless."

You only think that if you have zero intention of changing your mind, or zero thought that you could be wrong. It's cowardly and, unfortunately, heavily indicative of the conservative movement in modern politics.

Hey fatty don't you have a food pic to post on Twitter?
I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence on that Iowa High School yelling racial slurs at the championship game besides posting some 2 year old irrelevant article

 

[RedDenver]

Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.

Where/when did this happen?

I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.

Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.

Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between edited and unedited video? Here's a helpful example:

I stated that the Russia evidence exists.

EDIT: Notice that I didn't even change the order of the words, just deleted down to what I wanted it to appear that you said.

 

[zoogs]

How can someone be so void of intellect and curiosity that the only thing they know is to call people names?

What a pitiable thing you've become, Dewiz.

I suppose it makes sense for you to seek respect from the only corners where you can get it. Doesn't make it less ugly or disgraceful.

 

[knapplc]

It's an intellectually dishonest position. There's no intent to have a discussion, there's only an intent to win. Any contrary views to Dewitt's opinion is somewhere he "didn't want to go," because he thinks such discussions are "pointless."

You only think that if you have zero intention of changing your mind, or zero thought that you could be wrong. It's cowardly and, unfortunately, heavily indicative of the conservative movement in modern politics.

Hey fatty don't you have a food pic to post on Twitter?
I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence on that Iowa High School yelling racial slurs at the championship game besides posting some 2 year old irrelevant article

We do tend to emulate our heroes, don't we?

 

[zoogs]

How anyone expects to maintain a face in any civil society acting like this, with idols like that, is beyond me.

You'd have to avoid showing your reprehensible inner self, presumably. Is that hard?

 

[knapplc]

What you consider a civil society and what Dewiz considers a civil society are very, very different things, zoogs.

 

[Thanks_Tom RR]

Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.

Where/when did this happen?

I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.

Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.

Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between edited and unedited video? Here's a helpful example:

I stated that the Russia evidence exists.

EDIT: Notice that I didn't even change the order of the words, just deleted down to what I wanted it to appear that you said.

 

[Apathy]

Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.

Where/when did this happen?

I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.

Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.

Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.

Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between edited and unedited video? Here's a helpful example:

I stated that the Russia evidence exists.

EDIT: Notice that I didn't even change the order of the words, just deleted down to what I wanted it to appear that you said.

Disagree with me I don't care but what I see is a guy going in depth on answering the question confirming that I and millions in this country have been saying for months.....Russia BS story is nonexistent, never was and never has been

 

[Apathy]

How can someone be so void of intellect and curiosity that the only thing they know is to call people names?

Where were you when Knapp called me Dewitt two times prior to my comment??? How about the other ones before that???

 

[Redux]

 

[Apathy]

It's an intellectually dishonest position. There's no intent to have a discussion, there's only an intent to win. Any contrary views to Dewitt's opinion is somewhere he "didn't want to go," because he thinks such discussions are "pointless."

You only think that if you have zero intention of changing your mind, or zero thought that you could be wrong. It's cowardly and, unfortunately, heavily indicative of the conservative movement in modern politics.

Hey fatty don't you have a food pic to post on Twitter?
I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence on that Iowa High School yelling racial slurs at the championship game besides posting some 2 year old irrelevant article

We do tend to emulate our heroes, don't we?

Still waiting on that evidence

 

[knapplc]

How can someone be so void of intellect and curiosity that the only thing they know is to call people names?

Where were you when Knapp called me Dewitt two times prior to my comment??? How about the other ones before that???

You didn't call out the sockpuppet when he called you Dewitt. Why do I hold such a special place in your heart?

http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/statuses/user/14058-georgia-husker/?status_id=57685