Douchebag Thread for Politics & Religion Spill Over

this-is-a-shitshow-19221510.png
Love this gif.

How have I not seen it before. There's days it should be on the front banner.

 
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.
Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.
Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative. If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.
Are you aware of what O'keefe has done in the past? Those CNN journalist were just fired the other day for less ethically questionable things than what he has done. He's a known propagandists, and has a criminal record. He has been caught editing video to paint the narritive he wants. He was also interviewing someone from CNN's Atlanta office who works on health and medical pieces. Not someone in New York or DC who is in the routine political sphere.
Maybe there is nothing to this collusion things, for the sake of our country's security let's hope there isn't, but there is a hell of a lot of smoke, and some people very close to Trump are doing some extremly careless and dangerous things. I think if you're honest with yourself you would agree that there is enough smoke to warrant an investigation. If we can investigate Bengahzib 8 times, why can't we just take a look at this one?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would still stand by the Douchewhiz name if I were 12. but I'm not. So I won't.
But you did type it didn't you?
Lol like seriously we're in the Woodshed where there's a douchebag thread and endless amount of post from posters calling other posters names but by golly I call someone fat and get ridiculed lol
I agree Knapp is probably fat
This is not news. I've talked about it in the Health & Fitness forum, plus several people here have met me in person. I'm a big dude. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 
And yes, this is the Woodshed, where we call names and air it out. But that's all there is to you, which is why we're airing this out now. You know sh#t all about policy, nor do you care -- you're too busy indulging in this comic book fight in your head.

Only, real people will be hurt and your idols are the bad guys.

How do you stand being so completely, utterly lacking in substance? C'mon, man. You're a grown-up with a brain (and maybe a heart, somewhere in there). Use them sometime.

 
I would still stand by the Douchewhiz name if I were 12. but I'm not. So I won't.
But you did type it didn't you?
Lol like seriously we're in the Woodshed where there's a douchebag thread and endless amount of post from posters calling other posters names but by golly I call someone fat and get ridiculed lol
I agree Knapp is probably fat
This is not news. I've talked about it in the Health & Fitness forum, plus several people here have met me in person. I'm a big dude. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I was referring to how many times you fall off of your bike.

 
I would still stand by the Douchewhiz name if I were 12. but I'm not. So I won't.
But you did type it didn't you?
Lol like seriously we're in the Woodshed where there's a douchebag thread and endless amount of post from posters calling other posters names but by golly I call someone fat and get ridiculed lol
I agree Knapp is probably fat
Knapp has to be thin and svelte. Because if he's "fat", then that means I am something much worse than simply fat.

 
And yes, this is the Woodshed, where we call names and air it out. But that's all there is to you, which is why we're airing this out now. You know sh#t all about policy, nor do you care -- you're too busy indulging in this comic book fight in your head.

Only, real people will be hurt and your idols are the bad guys.

How do you stand being so completely, utterly lacking in substance? C'mon, man. You're a grown-up with a brain (and maybe a heart, somewhere in there). Use them sometime.
So who are these idols of mine that are the bad guys?
Another poster who thinks he knows me. Knapp tried doing that weeks ago and failed

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would still stand by the Douchewhiz name if I were 12. but I'm not. So I won't.
But you did type it didn't you?
Lol like seriously we're in the Woodshed where there's a douchebag thread and endless amount of post from posters calling other posters names but by golly I call someone fat and get ridiculed lol
I agree Knapp is probably fat
Knapp has to be thin and svelte. Because if he's "fat", then that means I am something much worse than simply fat.
I'm kinda fat. Sorry, man.

 
It's not obvious?...

It's really your own loss if we "fail" (at whatever this is, I guess?). And yes, I think you've put both your interest level and depth of policy knowledge on full display here. It's not been a pretty one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.
Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.
Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.
Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between edited and unedited video? Here's a helpful example:
I stated that the Russia evidence exists.
EDIT: Notice that I didn't even change the order of the words, just deleted down to what I wanted it to appear that you said.
Disagree with me I don't care but what I see is a guy going in depth on answering the question confirming that I and millions in this country have been saying for months.....Russia BS story is nonexistent, never was and never has been
Just going to ignore the whole part where O'Keefe is a known propagandist and liar - so trolling then.

 
Even after he admitted he is here to do nothing more than troll when it comes to politics.
Where/when did this happen?
I'll help you out it doesn't existZRod or Jim Acosta which ever one you prefer, after 3 weeks of my silence of answering your question, maybe just maybe my answer wasn't going to please you which would've lead to more questions from your end about my answer. That's something that I didn't want to go into because in the end it would've been pointless on both parties.
Would it? Or would it allow you to challenge your own beliefs (and hopefully me challenge mine as well) and start having a real conversation.
Lol (oops I must be trolling cause I typed lol) yes it would. First example was my status yesterday of the CNN producer who on video stated that the whole Russia story is BS and they don't have any evidence that it exists and yet you come back saying that the video was edited to fit a narrative.
If video evidence isn't going to challenge your own beliefs than nothing will.
Are you trolling or do you really not understand the difference between edited and unedited video? Here's a helpful example:
I stated that the Russia evidence exists.
EDIT: Notice that I didn't even change the order of the words, just deleted down to what I wanted it to appear that you said.
Disagree with me I don't care but what I see is a guy going in depth on answering the question confirming that I and millions in this country have been saying for months.....Russia BS story is nonexistent, never was and never has been
Just going to ignore the whole part where O'Keefe is a known propagandist and liar - so trolling then.
Why did O'Keefe secretly tape the producer of Health segments about Russia? This is bothering me.

I'm being serious, Dewiz. Help me out. It doesn't make sense to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would still stand by the Douchewhiz name if I were 12. but I'm not. So I won't.
But you did type it didn't you?
Lol like seriously we're in the Woodshed where there's a douchebag thread and endless amount of post from posters calling other posters names but by golly I call someone fat and get ridiculed lol
I agree Knapp is probably fat
Knapp has to be thin and svelte. Because if he's "fat", then that means I am something much worse than simply fat.
I'm kinda fat. Sorry, man.
18310107.gif


 
Back
Top