Maurice Washington Faces Charges

NM11046 said:
The article I read said one of the boys involved sent it to him.

The article I read said she was not consenting to the acts.

I will go back and try to find it - not sure when I may be able to do that.

Regardless - him making the decision to send it to anyone after receiving it (however he received it) is questionable at best.  
Click to expand...




Ya, I'd like to read it.

 
HuskerJax said:
I believe they can still be charged with distributing child porn, even if both are minors. I know a couple of students where I teach were charged for sending naked pics on their phones. Similar situation
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t want to be a teenager today. So many ways to get yourself in trouble. 

On a side note, I feel for the girl involved. Even if it was consensual, no student/person deserves that to be made public without their consent. Cyber bullying is F$&$ed. 

 
So in California, since she was 15, that is considered assault right?  Despite consent?

And I can totally buy that Mo didn’t know it was an assault when he received and resent the video.

 
StPaulHusker said:
So in California, since she was 15, that is considered assault right?  Despite consent?

And I can totally buy that Mo didn’t know it was an assault when he received and resent the video.
Click to expand...




Do you really think it's sexual assault to have sex with a 15 year old, period?

Edit: Holy s#!t, California has backwards laws.

And if your last sentence is sarcasm, that's crazytalk. Most people assume teenagers are allowed to have sexual activity with each other.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moiraine said:
Ya, I'd like to read it.
Click to expand...
https://www.omaha.com/huskers/football/husker-rb-maurice-washington-faces-child-porn-charges-in-california/article_7b65d5bc-3884-5eb6-ad35-70f6d04a68ad.html

I think this is it - I may have misunderstood that he got it direct from one of the boys - seems like they sent it to a lot of folks, so I may have made the leap there, or it may have been reported in different detail in the initial version (it's been updated with some corrections since it was initially published)

 
Moiraine said:
Do you really think it's sexual assault to have sex with a 15 year old, period?

Edit: Holy s#!t, California has backwards laws.
Click to expand...
No -

Do you think that being filmed having non consensual sex with two people would qualify as assault?  Does age really matter here?

 
NM11046 said:
No -

Do you think that being filmed having non consensual sex with two people would qualify as assault?  Does age really matter here?
Click to expand...




Why are you asking me this? That's not what I'm talking about in my reply. Yes, I think rape is okay all the time, as is the filming of it. /s

And you're wrong. It's illegal for teenagers to have sex in California.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moiraine said:
Do you really think it's sexual assault to have sex with a 15 year old, period?

Edit: Holy s#!t, California has backwards laws.

And if your last sentence is sarcasm, that's crazytalk. Most people assume teenagers are allowed to have sexual activity with each other.
Click to expand...
I don’t want to wade into what I think on assault being that I was 15 once.  I was talking more to just what the CA law states.  

And it it wasn’t sarcasm about Mo.  I can see where he thought it was consensual and not assault.  

 
Moiraine said:
My guess is that the video is inconclusive as far as whether it was assault, otherwise I think her parents would have tried their damnedest to have her press charges when it was sent out to everyone.
Click to expand...
I agree.

As a father of a 16 month old daughter, if anything like this happened to my daughter and I deemed the video to be a rape or sexual assault, I would make damn sure that charges were pressed.

I feel as though with Mo sending her that video reminded her that she was a hoe for sleeping with two dudes while it was being videotaped, the whole school got a copy, know damn well her parents have seen it and now when someone see’s her, they’ll know her for that skank who slept with two dudes who videotaped it.

 
StPaulHusker said:
I don’t want to wade into what I think on assault being that I was 15 once.  I was talking more to just what the CA law states.  

And it it wasn’t sarcasm about Mo.  I can see where he thought it was consensual and not assault.  
Click to expand...




Gotcha. What I meant by the question was 15 year olds and 15 year olds, because it was my impression that nationwide, it's legal. Which was wrong.

 
Moiraine said:
Why are you asking me this? That's not what I'm talking about in my reply. Yes, I think rape is okay all the time, as is the filming of it. /s

And you're wrong. It's illegal for teenagers to have sex in California.
Click to expand...
I was replying the same way you'd posed your comments before - misunderstood I guess.  Obviously you and I are out of synch this evening with tone here.

edit:  and my comment was made prior to your edit/addition of the last sentence of your comment about sarcasm - would have changed my response.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top