Maurice Washington Faces Charges

I never said a blow job couldn’t be assault and I’ve been looking at the whole picture the entire time, and the many reasons to doubt her claim are so substantial that I am confident saying that labeling this as an assault is disingenuous.  
I hope the pictures you have been looking at include only those 18 and older 

This thing is wild. Between the media's rush to report, and Bruning not making things exactly clear, it's a clownshow.

Oh, and I have zero problems with them not talking to the police until it's required. Even cops will tell you "don't talk to cops."
Why didnt everyone just do what Urban did and delete everything from his phone for the last two years? 

 
This thing is wild. Between the media's rush to report first, and Bruning not making things exactly clear, it's a clownshow.

Oh, and I have zero problems with them not talking to the police until it's required. Even cops will tell you "don't talk to cops."
Well put.

Personally, I don't have any issue with the media digging into any of this. That's their job and, now that they've sniffed out some irregularities, they're not going to stop any time soon.

That said, I still don't see enough smoke here to signal a significant fire, or at least not enough to start predicting things like someone is going to lose their job (which is what was claimed on S&B this morning). This sort of feels like someone who left the coffee pot plugged in before leaving for work. Could it be something more? Ehhh... I guess? Some of the reaction to all of this is little more than peak off-season behavior. I feel it's wiser to let everything play out.

Oh, and I think it's equally wise for a handful of you to probably not question any more what is or isn't sexual assault. According to the state of California, a person under 18 can't legally consent to sex, which inherently makes it a 'sexual assault.' We can go back and forth about nuance all we want but it is what it is.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well put.

Personally, I don't have any issue with the media digging into any of this. That's their job and, now that they've sniffed out some irregularities, they're not going to stop any time soon.

That said, I still don't see enough smoke here to signal a significant fire, or at least not enough to start predicting things like someone is going to lose their job (which is what was claimed on S&B this morning). This sort of feels like someone who left the coffee pot plugged in before leaving for work. Could it be something more? Ehhh... I guess? Some of the reaction to all of this is little more than peak off-season behavior. I feel it's wiser to let everything play out.

Oh, and I think it's equally wise for a handful of you to probably not talk any more about what is or isn't sexual assault. According to the state of California, a person under 18 can't legally consent to sex, which inherently makes it a 'sexual assault.' We can go back and forth about nuance all we want but it is what it is.


And who did our friends on S&B think was losing their job?

 
This should just be the name of the show.

"We're here on a Monday, welcome back to Sufficiently Vauge In The Morning, I'm Gary Sharp...."


"Let me tell you what, my man Gary, there's something going on with someone in some part of the athletic department, and it's somehow going to affect how some portion of one of the teams that plays, but I'm not at liberty to completely say what that something might be, or the person who might be the one who said it to me". 

- a thesis, by Damon Benning. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top