Douschebag Hall of Fame

I'd like to nominate the people who can't tell the difference in the 2-3 different arguments going on and keep blurring them together.

1. Just because there were no sexual assault allegations and no one seeing the video thought it was sexual assault, doesn't mean it wasn't sexual assault. Just because someone waits 2 years doesn't mean it wasn't sexual assault.

2. There are reasons to doubt it was sexual assault. I have my doubts that it was sexual assault, unrelated to the above. I don't think charges will ever be brought and there will almost definitely never be a conviction. The video likely would not add anything to the argument that it was sexual assault.

3. Washington didn't know it was a video of sexual assault, real or alleged.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
nominate everyone violating the sanctity of the db hof thread and turning it into a mo washington discussion when there is a perfectly good thread about him on the football board.

 
There are now separate threads for Mo Washington-related posts and for the Redux/StPaulHusker pissing match.

giphy.gif


 
JJ Husker said:
Yeah, what were you going on about?  The sanctity of the DBHOF has not been violated.  :lol:
Click to expand...
I have a question about DBHOF official nomination rules.  @Moiraine  quoted a post I made in the MW thread and responded with a picture of a kitty giving the bird.  I've never been nominated before so this was an exciting development.  Does this count as an official nomination though?  Normally people will post "I nominate ______" and the reason for the nomination.  I feel like I need to read the words "I nominate" to make it a nomination otherwise it's possible @Moiraine was just using the DBHOF as a woodshed thread where she could post naughty kitty pictures as part of the MW spillover.

 
Back
Top