The Biden / Ukraine Scandal

[knapplc]

I don't want to dig, because 1) my interest is mild, and 2) the info is now hard to find. 

For someone whose interest is mild, you're about single-handedly keeping this thread going.

The information on all of this is not hard to find. It's literally as difficult as going to the OP in this thread and dragging your eyes across a few articles.  Failing that, do a simple google search. I did it several times in the first few pages of this thread.

 

[Apsu]

The Mueller investigation had probable cause for believing the president obstructed justice. Whats the probable cause on biden and what crime should he be under investigation for?

I'd like some facts this time @Apsu

I missed that probable cause, to me it appeared as fishing since day one.

The entirity of Russiagate was a load of carp.

 

[Apsu]

Not a crime and frankly not on Biden whatsoever. So what did Biden do that was criminal or corrupt?

I suspected that what happened was not legal, but given the geopolitical reality realized that nothing would happen.

 

[Apsu]

I'm not name calling. You are acting childish in your posts. Lets see some factual information because the fact is Trump fired Comey over the Flynn investigation and that is coming from Trump himself. That is probable cause for an investigation into obstruction of justice. What is the potential crime Biden committed and where is the probable cause for an investigation?

Factual information is a casualty.

Flynn was the only person that Trump appointed who I liked, the first fired in the Russiagate witch hunt, and i believe now he may have been cleared of wrong doing.

 

[Apsu]

For someone whose interest is mild, you're about single-handedly keeping this thread going.

The information on all of this is not hard to find. It's literally as difficult as going to the OP in this thread and dragging your eyes across a few articles.  Failing that, do a simple google search. I did it several times in the first few pages of this thread.

Slow news day.

Rather talk about the state of the football program?

... me neither.

 

[Nebfanatic]

Factual information is a casualty.

Flynn was the only person that Trump appointed who I liked, the first fired in the Russiagate witch hunt, and i believe now he may have been cleared of wrong doing.

He pleaded guilty so how was he cleared of wrongdoing? The fact is Trump admitted to firing Comey because of this. Whether you like it or not that is probable cause for an investigation into obstruction of justice. You STILL haven't given me the potential crime or the probable cause that would warrent an investigation into Biden

 

[knapplc]

What's your chosen side?

Right now that would be Democratic Socialism.

The entirity of Russiagate was a load of carp.

Flynn was the only person that Trump appointed who I liked, the first fired in the Russiagate witch hunt, and i believe now he may have been cleared of wrong doing.

A lot of this doesn't jive.

 

[Apsu]

He pleaded guilty so how was he cleared of wrongdoing? The fact is Trump admitted to firing Comey because of this. Whether you like it or not that is probable cause for an investigation into obstruction of justice. You STILL haven't given me the potential crime or the probable cause that would warrent an investigation into Biden

Confessions happen for many reasons, often as part of a larger deal.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/10/michael-flynn-defense-alleges-doj-cover-up-russia-investigation/1545599001/

 

[Nebfanatic]

Confessions happen for many reasons, often as part of a larger deal.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/10/michael-flynn-defense-alleges-doj-cover-up-russia-investigation/1545599001/

That doesn't matter. Flynn was under investigation, Trump fired Comey because of it and that is called probable cause for an investigation into obstruction of justice. Still waiting on an example of such for Biden, the subject of this conversation

 

[sho]

Slow news day.

Rather talk about the state of the football program?

... me neither.

Well, we did get the Botham Jean verdict, so there's that in the news today.   I'm actually surprised by the verdict.

 

[Apsu]

A lot of this doesn't jive.

As a progressive, Russiagate had three main objectives:

1) Make an excuse as to why Hillary lost, to justify not fixing the DNC.

2) To start a new cold war with Russia, which we now have.

3) To justify the censorship of alternative media.

Sanders has not said much about Russiagate, just enough to keep him in the good graces of the DNC so they don't blackball his candidacy.

Michal Flynn was anti-war, which would have made him a good National Security Advisor.

Does it jive now?

 

[Apsu]

That doesn't matter. Flynn was under investigation, Trump fired Comey because of it and that is called probable cause for an investigation into obstruction of justice. Still waiting on an example of such for Biden, the subject of this conversation

Still waiting on the investigation, but you knew that.

 

[Fru]

As a progressive, Russiagate had three main objectives:

1) Make an excuse as to why Hillary lost, to justify not fixing the DNC.

2) To start a new cold war with Russia, which we now have.

3) To justify the censorship of alternative media.

Sanders has not said much about Russiagate, just enough to keep him in the good graces of the DNC so they don't blackball his candidacy.

Michal Flynn was anti-war, which would have made him a good National Security Advisor.

Does it jive now?

lol wut? 

 

[Nebfanatic]

As a progressive, Russiagate had three main objectives:

1) Make an excuse as to why Hillary lost, to justify not fixing the DNC.

2) To start a new cold war with Russia, which we now have.

3) To justify the censorship of alternative media.

Sanders has not said much about Russiagate, just enough to keep him in the good graces of the DNC so they don't blackball his candidacy.

Michal Flynn was anti-war, which would have made him a good National Security Advisor.

Does it jive now?

Still waiting on the investigation, but you knew that.

What is the probable cause to warrent an investigation in the first place???

 

[knapplc]

As a progressive, Russiagate had three main objectives:

1) Make an excuse as to why Hillary lost, to justify not fixing the DNC.

2) To start a new cold war with Russia, which we now have.

3) To justify the censorship of alternative media.

Sanders has not said much about Russiagate, just enough to keep him in the good graces of the DNC so they don't blackball his candidacy.

Michal Flynn was anti-war, which would have made him a good National Security Advisor.

Literally none of this is true, and these are not tenets of Democratic thinking.

Does it jive now?
 

No.