The First Trump Impeachment Thread

Great quote  and they also attack the messenger.  Amabassador Taylor is a highly respected individual.  The WH of course, states he is a part of a smear campaign.

I don't know, who should I trust  - the lying orange face in the WH who lies every day or the Ambassador who is highly respected by both parties, West Point grad, Vietnam Vet leader, long tenured public servant.   I just don't know.  :sarcasm

https://www.yahoo.com/news/model-diplomat-now-center-scandal-120541162.html

A West Point graduate who served for six years as an Army infantry officer, including with the 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam, Taylor is among the country’s most experienced diplomats, and has served in every administration of both parties since 1985.

Former officials of both parties described Taylor in glowing terms and suggested that his credibility would be difficult for Trump’s allies to question.

“Ambassador Bill Taylor is a person of integrity with a strong, ethical base,” said R. Nicholas Burns, a former undersecretary of state in the Bush administration. “I would also describe him as a true patriot. His entire professional life has been in service to the U.S.”

Stephen Sestanovich, who served as the State Department’s ambassador-at-large for the former Soviet Union under President Bill Clinton and who has traveled in Ukraine with Taylor, echoed that praise.

“You couldn’t ask for a more credible, universally respected, upright public servant to testify on the facts of this case,” he said, adding, “You want to go against Bill Taylor, you’ve got the whole city against you.”

The administration disputed that view on Tuesday. The White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, insisted in a statement that Trump “has done nothing wrong,” and lashed out at “a coordinated smear campaign from far-left lawmakers and radical unelected bureaucrats waging war on the Constitution.”

But few, if any, people who have worked with him see a radical in Taylor, who is soft-spoken and conservative in demeanor. Instead they describe someone motivated by American ideals since he served in the military and then entered government, first as an Energy Department employee and then a staff member for Sen. Bill Bradley, D-N.J.

 
What exactly is this stunt? There are Republicans in that room. If these guys want to know what's going on... why not just ask them?


Look at the diversity in this group, too. Three women, and the rest are white males over 50.

 
There's no good reason why the Sergeant At Arms hasn't arrested these idiots yet.


This stunt is happening because these guys are claiming that the investigation is being done behind closed doors (which, as an investigation, it should), and Republicans are being left out of the process.

This is a stupid lie only believed by stupid people. 

Republicans in the room while testimony is being heard include:

Devin Nunes, Ranking Member. 22nd District of California

Mike Conaway. 11th District of Texas

Michael Turner. 10th District of Ohio

Brad Wenstrup. 2nd District of Ohio

Chris Stewart. 2nd Dis of Utah

Rick Crawford. 1st Dis of Ark

When your party is being raked through the mud by damning testimony, apparently you have to resort to stunts like this. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
another example of why i am voting straight dem ticket this time.   last election i made the mistake of only voting for the dem on the presidential vote.   but stuck with what i thought was a normal, sane conservative party.   it's proved not to be sane anymore.  


I believe every Representative from Nebraska signed the censure bill against Schiff. No way I can vote for these people again. The party needs a purge.

 
All of those jackasses need to immediately be arrested and charged with whatever charges apply regarding national security violations, ethics violations, obstruction of justice, witness intimidation. In no courtroom in America would this $h!t be allowed, in no workplace in America would this behavior be tolerated. Is there not one single sane Republican who will stand up and blast their colleagues for this sort of nonsense?

Even before today, anyone who can stand up and demonstrate any grasp of the rules and procedures, and explain to the children what "due process" actually means (and when it applies)? 

I simply cannot fathom why any politician would hitch their wagon to this mess, let alone large numbers of them.

 
Back
Top