The P&R Plague Thread (Covid-19)

knapplc said:
Aside from making this political and carrying Trump's water like a good boy, what purpose does this serve?

Who is he even talking about? This is something everyone would abhor. Show us the article, or the clip this is about.
Click to expand...
So places like CNN are reporting the death toll/cases as they should, and Trump is out here bragging about his TV ratings - and the media is the one who can't contain their glee and delight? 

giphy.gif


 
Somebody knocked *a little* sense into Trump. Extending guidelines until April 30th. He seems to be making up a theory NY hospitals are selling masks on the black market, but he keeps talking about a potential for 2.2 million deaths if we did nothing so he seems to be flipping the script 

 
knapplc said:
I would bet nearly no one watches those pressers to see a Trump train wreck. It's a pretty serious topic to be taking that lightly. Besides, that's what late-night shows are for.
Click to expand...
Everyone is watching for updates from the medical experts like Fouci and Birx. 
 

The village idiot is just the one we need to listen to before them. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Decoy73 said:
I hate to prolong this futile discussion, but...  Did someone say this?  
Click to expand...


Decoy73 said:
I’m all for helping other countries, but take care of your own first.  This confirms the denial this administration had over a potential pandemic.  Cluelessness at its finest. 
Click to expand...
Maybe your initial post on this didn’t convey what you meant to say, but it sure came across as “we shouldn’t have sent that stuff to help China”.

And I don’t wish to prolong it any further either.

 
JJ Husker said:
Maybe your initial post on this didn’t convey what you meant to say, but it sure came across as “we shouldn’t have sent that stuff to help China”.

And I don’t wish to prolong it any further either.
Click to expand...
I said what I meant to say and I really don’t know how it Is that difficult to understand.  How you interpret that is on you I guess.  

 
Decoy73 said:
I said what I meant to say and I really don’t know how it Is that difficult to understand.  How you interpret that is on you I guess.  
Click to expand...
My interpretation isn’t the problem. It’s just a fundamental difference of opinion. I think we should’ve sent the supplies AND assured replacement of those supplies. You don’t think we should’ve sent them without making sure we would have replacements. It may seem like the exact same thing to you but it isn’t unless you’re willing walk back the idea they never should’ve been sent (which you apparently don’t want to do). So, I seem to be interpreting it exactly as you intend. Peace.

 
Back
Top