The P&R Plague Thread (Covid-19)

BlitzFirst said:
Medical Doctors are not trained to analyze statistics for infectious diseases.  What they say as MD's should be thrown to the wayside no matter what it is.

This is akin to a Therapist looking at a Psychology experiment and coming to conclusions based on the stats in the experiment...they work in the field of psychology...but they're not qualified to make determinations.
Click to expand...
So, then @BlitzFirst, you are saying that if person who specialized in "analyzing statistics" would come up with a totally different conclusion? 


 

 
These guys make money by running urgent cares in the Bakersfield area.  They are desperate for people to go out and get hurt.  Dr. Erickson isn't doesn't even have an MD and the other guy is an emergency room Dr.

There is a long list of what's wrong with this video.  It's not worth debating, it's junk.

https://www.turnto23.com/news/coronavirus/joint-statement-issued-by-national-physicians-groups-calls-local-doctors-statement-reckless-and-untested-musings

https://theprepared.com/blog/dr-ericksons-viral-covid-19-briefing-video-is-dangerously-wrong/

 
lol

EW8XgwDXsAUfYQX


 
BigRedN said:
So, then @BlitzFirst, you are saying that if person who specialized in "analyzing statistics" would come up with a totally different conclusion? 


 
Click to expand...
They're trying to take statistics from one area in California and extrapolate it for larger regions. That's not a representative sample so it's not helpful. Then they are trying to cherry pick stats from another country or city and use them to prove a point without really diving into customs and normal behaviors in that country. They're also not discussing the differences in testing for those places. These guys are not epidemiologist, they do not study how diseases spread. They study how to treat people.

If you're waiting for two million deaths then you sound willfully ignorant. Those were initial projections from early models of the virus that were based on the assumption of doing nothing to prevent it. They were the best that could be done at the time and models have gotten better since, but again they assumed doing nothing which is not the case.

 
commando said:
from your link

Our counts often track 1–2 weeks behind other data for a number of reasons: Death certificates take time to be completed.
Click to expand...
Yes, I get this.  These charts are so confusing.  Last week the numbers were about ready to surpass 60,000 here on the CDC.  As I read it now, it's back down to 38,000 total deaths ... if I read it correctly.  

I have a Masters Degree ... but I can't understand the constant change in numbers and how people who are classified as dead to Covid can come back to life?

 

 
BigRedN said:
Yes, I get this.  These charts are so confusing.  Last week the numbers were about ready to surpass 60,000 here on the CDC.  As I read it now, it's back down to 38,000 total deaths ... if I read it correctly.  

I have a Masters Degree ... but I can't understand the constant change in numbers and how people who are classified as dead to Covid can come back to life?

 
Click to expand...
2 different charts.  1 doesn't wait for the death certificate to be filed with the federal government...the other does.  but someone with a masters degree should be able to figure that out.....right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
commando said:
2 different charts.  1 doesn't wait for the death certificate to be filed with the federal government...the other does.   
Click to expand...


I've followed the same chart ... and the CDC changes their numbers.  Their is far too much at risk to be changing numbers and making educated folks believe they either can't read or need the government to explain basic truth to me.  This is starting to feel like China to me.

 
BigRedN said:
I've followed the same chart ... and the CDC changes their numbers.  Their is far too much at risk to be changing numbers and making educated folks believe they either can't read or need the government to explain basic truth to me.  This is starting to feel like China to me.
Click to expand...
i have not been following the chart you linked...so have no idea if the numbers have been changing on it or not.    but thats not the charts anyone uses when talking about corona since it lags so far behind.   

 
commando said:
i have not been following the chart you linked...so have no idea if the numbers have been changing on it or not.    but thats not the charts anyone uses when talking about corona since it lags so far behind.   
Click to expand...
If you follow the original link ... it updates every day.  Their stats as of today, are 38,000.

Here is that link ... https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm?fbclid=IwAR1kxq4QkJ_QxiV9GXv3XvbT0nQQYwnSVkZ-NdHMGzAoIcn3-EC678-Gevw

There is also this link on the CDC .. .and these numbers are different ... around 65,000.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html?fbclid=IwAR2hC40yxt03rvRR2J1s1V9C8CC-BAdCdEbAxAEmtx69CzuNW8zTILyO97M

I'll keep following this page and hope to understand more.  No need to respond to me ... just posting these two links that seem to contradict each other.  

 
Back
Top