All I have to get on for you two is the majority of what I see you post. I don't want to go down the schoolyard playground route but, my defense of the cops was in direct response to the attacks already underway. Yes, many of those cops were out of line. Many more were simply having a normal human response to the stress of the situation. And some, some of those videos and links claiming unprovoked, unwarned attacks on peaceful protesters were complete bullsh#t. I know for a fact that whiner guy on the news was full of sh#t. I was watching his live coverage. He had an agenda and played it up for who knows what reason. Maybe because he didn't retreat and disperse and got gassed and allegedly took a rubber bullet to the knee. Why were there no protesters between him and the cops who were still over half a block away. He should be reporting on the event, not being so stupid and belligerent that HE becomes the news. Numerous other of those clips were so brief and edited, with outlandish claims, it causes me to doubt their veracity. When a protest turns into a riot there are going to be bad actors on both sides. As BRI said, they aren't machines. So yeah, I accept some of their bad behavior as inevitable, just as I accept protests like these will often turn violent. It's disingenuous to claim one side is more at fault. In certain situations, yes, but not overall and not generally. We all saw what happened the one night Minneapolis police let the protesters completely go uncontested. There wasn't a cop on the street anywhere. So, why was that the most destructive night of all? Kind of shoots holes in the claims that the cops are inciting all the destruction.
But I don't listen. Yet all you are able to take away from what I just said is white knighting for the police. Check the log in your own eye.