Roe v Wade overturned????? Draft says so

Do you agree wt the draft majority opinion

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 20.0%
  • No

    Votes: 28 80.0%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    35
It’s pretty sick that 29% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all cases.   Believing it’s ok on Aborting a viable baby a day before natural birth, a month before natural birth, etc. is pretty gross. 
It's pretty sick that Archy spews nonsense like this all time. Just about 99 percent of abortions happen before 21 weeks and most of the terminations at or after 21 weeks were very wanted pregnancies but resulted in serious fetal anomalies. 

Im no doctor but common sense tells me if someone is actually considering "aborting" a healthy baby one day before expected natural birth, they're probably in labor and it's called giving birth at this point. 

 
Did you ever look into this to see if this claim is true? If so, what did you find out?
Yes, I did - that is why I said  "So I was told".    A lot of mis info out there to paint the 'other side' as the demon.   Her real or primary goal was preventing birth defects.    It also often bothered me with the thought - how can sincerely religious people (which I considered myself to be as well) can be pro choice while I'm pro-life.   So, we find people on both sides of most arguments (politics, abortion, economic, etc) to present half truths and as they say - "Be aware of half truths, you may get the wrong half".  I didn't have the full truth. 

 
It's pretty sick that Archy spews nonsense like this all time. Just about 99 percent of abortions happen before 21 weeks and most of the terminations at or after 21 weeks were very wanted pregnancies but resulted in serious fetal anomalies. 

Im no doctor but common sense tells me if someone is actually considering "aborting" a healthy baby one day before expected natural birth, they're probably in labor and it's called giving birth at this point. 


I'm guessing 99.99% of people would say that Ms. Strawdog should not be able to kill her healthy baby mere days before natural birth.

The reason you also reject blanket anti-abortion terms are the cases where the woman and her doctor understand that the mother's life is at risk, at which point you still attempt to deliver a live baby early and nobody calls it an abortion. 

 
It's a fact that Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist, and that her birth control outreach to Black and underclass communities could be interpreted in the worst possible way. 

Planned Parenthood fully acknowledges this, honoring Sanger's efforts on behalf of women's health and denouncing her embrace of eugenics. 

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/cc/2e/cc2e84f2-126f-41a5-a24b-43e093c47b2c/210414-sanger-opposition-claims-p01.pdf


That's good to know.

 
Legal in all cases means just exactly that!   That they are fine with the situation you just presented. 
No. To many people, it means this shouldn't be decided by a bunch of politicians that have no clue about individual situations making an absolute law that can greatly negatively affect someone's personal health and wellbeing.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im no doctor
Correct.  
 

Im no doctor but common sense tells me if someone is actually considering "aborting" a healthy baby one day before expected natural birth, they're probably in labor and it's called giving birth at this point. 
Incorrect.   “Legal in all cases” means they can abort the child anytime before natural birth or induced birth in order to have the baby.   
 

Will thousands of people get cold feet 30 days before their due date and go for abortion?  Doubtful, but even having that as an option is quite insane.  As you know. 

 
Back
Top