BigRedBuster
Active member
[No message]
I have no issue either way on the bump stock ban, but did you know legal reasoning SCOTUS struck down the executive order? Was it because the majority really wanted bump stocks around or because they thought the EO was not constitutionally sound?in 1 of the few times i agreed with Trump he banned bump stocks after the las vegas shooting. this morning the SC went further to the right than the trump administration and repealed his ban on bump stocks.
I mean she didn't say anything about the EO in her comment. So maybe she is keeping them separate in this instance? Then again maybe she recognizes that yes most people would be in favor of a bump stock ban and that an EO helped that? So I guess maybe they are different but still relate to each other?I remember just yesterday someone trying to tell us that the Squad members were so very book smart and how that meant they were so very smart in their job duties. So smart one of them doesn’t even understand the difference between EO’s and legislatively passed laws :facepalm: I guess I never knew Executive Orders were the “will of the people”
So that means, in, Texas, the guy will be tried for abortion too.there was another mass shooting last night in round rock texas. several injured and at least 2 dead...including a pregnant woman
but the gov will pardon him when he claims he thought the baby was going to shoot himSo that means, in, Texas, the guy will be tried for abortion too.