Yep.Was that you that pointed it out the other day?
Everyone says that, I normally take the under on Iowa too, but then they win 9 or 10 games against all reason. Way more money has been made betting the under on Nebraska than Iowa in the last decade.Vegas likes you liking that Iowa win total, too.
Yeah I thought +900 was a bit light. But it’s tough to make money on No at -1000.9-1 (or a 10% chance) for NU to make the playoffs. I think we are quite a bit more of a longshot than that.
It's interesting that NU is favored in 10 of 12, yet the Win total is at 7.5.
It's interesting that NU is favored in 10 of 12, yet the Win total is at 7.5.
Good catch.I’m seeing 9/12. Iowa, USC, and Ohio St as the 3 not favored in
Once you understand that the numbers are just trying to hit the middle of the gambling money in total it makes sense. The bookies just want to take their cut from reading the betting population. They don't think that NU will win 7.5. They think that the bettors will be 50% 7- and 50% 8+.
Based on paper... on the field, a guy could have made a fortune betting against NU the past decade. I'm optimistic but I'm not betting a dime until I see them prove it on the field.I get that. But it shows that maybe the Huskers are a bit underrated coming into the season.
Based on paper... on the field, a guy could have made a fortune betting against NU the past decade. In optimistic but I'm not being a dime until I see them prove it on the field.
Once you understand that the numbers are just trying to hit the middle of the gambling money in total it makes sense. The bookies just want to take their cut from reading the betting population.
Biggest fallacy in sports betting. The vigorish is just a safeguard, a house edge that protects them over time. There are loads of bets out there where the bookie has significant liability if a certain result pops up. There are also lots of bets where they have a massive edge.
I've never met a bookie that was in it just for the juice, they all play. Same with casinos.