The Democrat Utopia

Nah what Sunny posted is non sequitur. Just because people are actually getting out the vote doesn’t say anything about the intentions of the legislators who crafted those laws.

If you think they did so for any reason other than to benefit their team, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
just because they failed in their attempt means nothing.  just like trump failed in his bid to throw away the election results with his fake electors scheme.......archy is fine with both since they failed and we shouldn't have any concerns about their next attempts to achieve those goals.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since there's no hole in the ozone layer now, it wasn't ever actually a problem! Right?

No, just kidding. But it's okay - any adult with a reasonable amount of ability to think critically knows not to jump to correlated conclusions.

 
Since there's no hole in the ozone layer now, it wasn't ever actually a problem! Right?

No, just kidding. But it's okay - any adult with a reasonable amount of ability to think critically knows not to jump to correlated conclusions.
Ozone Layer would have been a great name for an 80's band...

Of course, they would have been huge with tunes like, Sunburnt Baby, Melanoma ' Mama, and Year Round Bronze.

Everyone would have loved them, dudes, chicks, and fast forward to now and they would have to issue an apology while the Climate Bros tried to cancel them. 

#OzoneLayer 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ozone Layer would have been a great name for an 80's band...

Of course, they would have been huge with tunes like, Sunburnt Baby, Melanoma ' Mama, and Year Round Broze.

Everyone would have loved them, dudes, chicks, and fast forward to now and they would have to issue an apology while the Climate Bros tried to cancel them. 

#OzoneLayer 
image.jpeg

And just think of the amount of hairspray they would use!!!!

 
Nah what Sunny posted is non sequitur. Just because people are actually getting out the vote doesn’t say anything about the intentions of the legislators who crafted those laws.

If you think they did so for any reason other than to benefit their team, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
Here is the issue you have and makes what you say nonsense.   No matter what was going to happen with turnout, you were going to scream Jim Crow 2.0.   Your side had a hissy fit, cried and moaned, about his turnout is going to be depressed and people just won’t be able to vote.   
 

Well, we now know for two elections in a row, you all were absolutely Wrong and unnecessarily trying to divide the country with that nonsense.  Well done on that part I guess. 

 
Here is the issue you have and makes what you say nonsense.   No matter what was going to happen with turnout, you were going to scream Jim Crow 2.0.   Your side had a hissy fit, cried and moaned, about his turnout is going to be depressed and people just won’t be able to vote.   


Yeah, no. People were up in arms about the effort, not the result. And with good reason, backed by evidence and admission of exactly what the GOP operatives were clearly trying to do.

The right fought to suppress the vote, and the left fought back harder.

Here is the issue you have and makes what you say nonsense.   No matter what was going to happen with turnout, you were going to scream Jim Crow 2.0.


Look in the mirror dude. If Georgia voter turnouts were significantly lower the last two elections, you would certainly not be in here admitting to the right wing schemes of disenfranchisement.

 
Yeah, no. People were up in arms about the effort, not the result. And with good reason, backed by evidence and admission of exactly what the GOP operatives were clearly trying to do.

The right fought to suppress the vote, and the left fought back harder.
What was done to suppress vote again?   Ban giving food and water to someone within what, 25 yards of a polling place?   Requiring voter ID?   Geesh.  Some REALLY tough requirements🤦‍♂️

But of course Jim Crow 2.0 for you and your crew.  Well I guess until it really actually wasn’t.    Who coulda imagined all the faux outrage designed for one thing….to get rid of the Senate filibuster…..was all a sham?   

 
Look in the mirror dude. If Georgia voter turnouts were significantly lower the last two elections, you would certainly not be in here admitting to the right wing schemes of disenfranchisement.
Why would  I admit to something that was NEVER going to happen.  All you had to do was read the actual bill in question.   It wasn’t really too hard to figure this out my dude. 

 
You'd have to give me actual literal quotes of democrats and board members saying that the right to vote was being taken away for me to believe it. I believe that claims have been made that the voting rights of some have been infringed upon, or are in jeopardy, are being attacked and so on, but I am skeptical of that claim being made by people because that claim isn't true.

Thankfully, thus far in Georgia, voter registration and turnout have swelled despite efforts to suppress it (attaching a correlation to the two ie 'voter surpression is proven by less votes or proven fake by more votes' is irresponsible without rigorous study controlling for multiple variables). I'm no expert and can offer no specific insight into the inner workings and framework of who is responsible for what/where/how in terms of polling places, but I do know that the state has several hundred fewer polling places now than it did before the Voting Rights Act got gutted. Some counties have had have had 80+% of their sites closed and some (I think 7) have one single polling site for hundreds of square miles. I also know that since the Georgia bill went into effect, the Atlanta metro area's number of ballot drop off boxes has dropped from over 100 to 25 or so. 

Again, to answer your question very clearly of "Who doesn’t have the right to vote that used to have the right to vote?", the answer is either nobody or a very very small number of people. But that's not what people are talking about and you know that. 

Voter suppression isn't denying people a right that they used to have, because the bad actors with bad intentions aren't stupid enough to spell it out that way. Instead, it's coming up with barriers, impediments, annoyances, and confusion that follow the letter of the law but have a clear yet unspoken spirit behind them. It's making election workers have to deal with hundreds of hours of "voter challenges" issued by other voters (A 2022 challenge to 37,000 voters in Gwinnett County forced 5 to 10 election staffers to work “all day, every day, six days a week” for multiple weeks and did not turn up a single ineligible voter). It's making college students have to drive two hours back home to vote in person because they're confused and don't want challenges by trying to do mail-in. It's making some folks have to stand in line for six hours. It's making other folks have to go to a hearing to prove their eligibility when they realize their registration is in jeopardy because of a clerical error that someone has challenged. 

The correct technical answer to "Who doesn’t have the right to vote that used to have the right to vote?" now is the same correct technical answer to the same question in the Jim Crowe days. More interesting questions to me are who has a more difficult time being able to exercise their right to vote now than they did before, who's making that more difficult, and why?








Now, archy won't really be interested in this, but to anyone else curious about more insights into the f#&%ery that's been going on in Georgia, there's some good info here (18:30 mark if the timestamp link doesn't work), including new regulations that have a decent enough step-by-step chance of causing chaos and doubt and possibly even leading to just excluding entire precincts from the count.



 
I’m finding it funny that the Republican Party nominee in the last three elections admires dictators and keeps saying and doing hitler things. His own cabinet members won’t endorse him and talk about how he admired hitler. Republicans then turn around and try gaslighting people when they are pointing out. 
 

They do that instead of saying….holy s#!t, maybe we should nominate someone who doesn’t admire hitler. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top