Big Red Viking
New member
Doesn't this point to a lack of coaching and recruiting ?I think our staff is going to buy LT's for the next couple of years.
Doesn't this point to a lack of coaching and recruiting ?I think our staff is going to buy LT's for the next couple of years.
Doesn't this point to a lack of coaching and recruiting ?
Thanks for the response\insightWell kind of. The hope was that someone like Brock Knutson would be ready for this position but he may be a fringe D1 lineman for one reason or another. I think Gunnar could be a good LT, and I thought he played very well. But it seems that the staff wants him at RT for the next three years, which I see for him as well.
Their biggest misses have been at LT and now they are focusing on high-upside guys at that position, with hoping they can outbid for one in the portal. The top HS LT's are not going to come here yet.
Your not going to get a elite back when you dont showcase that position. Maybe its due to talent but i feel we have had the backs to be a true #1 and get the majority of the carries. But year after year we play one for a game or 2 then go with another one. No elite RB wants to go some some where its a revolving door. I believe thats why EJ was getting out of here> With Dana i think we will have a Said #1 and get the majority carries then everyone else.I think winning solves that position, along with RB. We have a big year and some elite talent will get back filled. I just don't see us waiting on a young LT while Dylan is here. We will see how it plays out with Gunnar gets back because he may solve that issue going into '26.
I think we've overused the starting back and they've run down after a few games. It's why we see 2-3 games where a back looks good and then drops off. I'm not sure what the answer is though.Your not going to get a elite back when you dont showcase that position. Maybe its due to talent but i feel we have had the backs to be a true #1 and get the majority of the carries. But year after year we play one for a game or 2 then go with another one. No elite RB wants to go some some where its a revolving door. I believe thats why EJ was getting out of here> With Dana i think we will have a Said #1 and get the majority carries then everyone else.
If our backs are getting over used or worn down with 10-15 carries we have worse problems lolI think we've overused the starting back and they've run down after a few games. It's why we see 2-3 games where a back looks good and then drops off. I'm not sure what the answer is though.
Your not going to get a elite back when you dont showcase that position. Maybe its due to talent but i feel we have had the backs to be a true #1 and get the majority of the carries. But year after year we play one for a game or 2 then go with another one. No elite RB wants to go some some where its a revolving door. I believe thats why EJ was getting out of here> With Dana i think we will have a Said #1 and get the majority carries then everyone else.
It's not just the carries but also the total number of plays. They still get tired even when they don't get the ball.If our backs are getting over used or worn down with 10-15 carries we have worse problems lol
JEJ needs to become a center. Be the center. At 6'0 feet tall, this offense really has no other option for him.Sounds like Evans is trending towards the Center spot
Spindler basically a lock at RG
Pritchett very likely to be the LT
Not sure who the next likely LG is if Evans moves to the middle.
Pretty sure Lutovsky is also a lock at that other guard spot once he is healed up.
Makes me wonder if he is cross training. I do not see it personally. Unless they think the Gottula injury is going to be brutal. Depth is a question mark there. Tuner and Teddy cannot stay healthy. Knaak you could maybe move there in a pinch as I thought he was currently at guard. A lot easier to replace a guard than a tackle.He's still working at RT as of yesterday