sd'sker
Banned
i am guessing a schedule where it would be unlikely to get 8 wins. maybe a schedule where you would likely be favored in less than 7 games?Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
i am guessing a schedule where it would be unlikely to get 8 wins. maybe a schedule where you would likely be favored in less than 7 games?Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
i am guessing a schedule where it would be unlikely to get 8 wins. maybe a schedule where you would likely be favored in less than 7 games?Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
It's an assessment of a schedules difficulty based on the records of the teams on said schedule the previous year. Before the season starts. What I'm getting at is it's not a fixed rating. It will move based on performance of the current season. Once it starts. Because we are in the preseason, you see.It is not "according to a preseason poll." Preseason polls have nothing to do with the 18th ranked SOS mentioned in the article.
i think polo's point is who cares about other teams' schedules. what should we think about our schedule. he demonstrated that we should pretty easily get 8 wins. do you disagree?Tough SOS = every one but Nebraska.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Easy SOS = Nebraska.
Math, its that objective.
2011Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
the relative toughness of a schedule is contingent upon how good a team you are.I asked for an example not an ideology that is flawed because it is more likely to get more wins the better your team isi am guessing a schedule where it would be unlikely to get 8 wins. maybe a schedule where you would likely be favored in less than 7 games?Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?![]()
The definition of false dichotomy is going to take up 21 pages in the dictionary if this continues.i think polo's point is who cares about other teams' schedules. what should we think about our schedule. he demonstrated that we should pretty easily get 8 wins. do you disagree?Tough SOS = every one but Nebraska. Easy SOS = Nebraska.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Math, its that objective.
talk about false dichotomies.
Broncos, Seahawks, 49rs, bears.....Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
In order to have perspective/reasonable expectations, I think we should care about other teams' SOS.i think polo's point is who cares about other teams' schedules. what should we think about our schedule. he demonstrated that we should pretty easily get 8 wins. do you disagree?Tough SOS = every one but Nebraska.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Easy SOS = Nebraska.
Math, its that objective.
talk about false dichotomies.
Dude, there's no reason to do that. I answered his question honestly. Stop putting words in my mouth and trolling.Broncos, Seahawks, 49rs, bears.....But then again, we ARE Nebraska, we should easily beat those cupcakes.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
2011Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Florida AtlanticMcNeese st
Illinois
Purdue
Rutgers
Fresno St (this could be tougher than expected but several here have been awfully dismissive of them)
So there is all but a guaranteed bowl eligibility section right there.
Minnesota, Northwestern and Iowa.
-all games I would say 98% of the people here expect to win (and rightly so, IMO.). So let's just say they beat Minnesota and Iowa. There's 8 wins.
Wisconsin, Michigan St, and the potential CCG or bowl game.
--and there's why Bo is paid three plus mil a year. And how 2014 should be judged. Does he beat those two teams? Does the team get to the CCG? Are they in good bowl or are we trumpeting another gator bowl trophy?
Actually it's contingent upon how good the teams you are playing are, relative to how good the teams other teams are playing are.the relative toughness of a schedule is contingent upon how good a team you are.
That is a good point.In order to have perspective/reasonable expectations, I think we should care about other teams' SOS.i think polo's point is who cares about other teams' schedules. what should we think about our schedule. he demonstrated that we should pretty easily get 8 wins. do you disagree?Tough SOS = every one but Nebraska. Easy SOS = Nebraska.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Math, its that objective.
talk about false dichotomies.
I have never mentioned a false dichotomy.
If you're actually going to try and compare those two schedules and call them similar I guess you can. I'm not going to because it's insane.2011Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Florida Atlantic
McNeese st
Illinois
Purdue
Rutgers
Fresno St (this could be tougher than expected but several here have been awfully dismissive of them)
So there is all but a guaranteed bowl eligibility section right there.
Minnesota, Northwestern and Iowa.
-all games I would say 98% of the people here expect to win (and rightly so, IMO.). So let's just say they beat Minnesota and Iowa. There's 8 wins.
Wisconsin, Michigan St, and the potential CCG or bowl game.
--and there's why Bo is paid three plus mil a year. And how 2014 should be judged. Does he beat those two teams? Does the team get to the CCG? Are they in good bowl or are we trumpeting another gator bowl trophy?
Chattanooga
Fresno
Wyoming
Washington
Minnesota
Iowa
okay there's bowl eligibility
6-7 Ohio State, Northwestern
- probably games that 98% of fans expected to win??
Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State, and postseason
Here's the "paycheck earning" games. So 2011 is a tough schedule because of one slightly better opponent and 2014 isn't a tough schedule because..?
why? how does another team's sos affect how we should view our own? polo seemed pretty reasonable how he got to 8 wins and what the tossup games were. do you disagree?In order to have perspective/reasonable expectations, I think we should care about other teams' SOS.i think polo's point is who cares about other teams' schedules. what should we think about our schedule. he demonstrated that we should pretty easily get 8 wins. do you disagree?Tough SOS = every one but Nebraska.Polo, what would be an example of a tough schedule by your metric?
Easy SOS = Nebraska.
Math, its that objective.
talk about false dichotomies.
I have never mentioned a false dichotomy.