Douschebag Hall of Fame

Guy Chamberlin said:
Some have opined that MAGA has succeeded by giving a voice -- an angry righteous voice -- to people suffering from self-inflicted loneliness that they want to blame on a changing world.

Just saying. 
Click to expand...
For 30 years the censorship of conservative agenda and voice has been overwhelming. 

The media remains complete and utter leftist garbage. 

Corporate big shots, Musk first but now even Zuckerburg are detailing it... 

The left is corrupt. The left is hateful. The left does support domestic terror and protect the offenders from justice.

So yes, after 30 years of leftist bulls#!t and lies... yes, it feels AWESOME to throw those lies in the left's face. Still, don't cry lefties, it's very clear your hate filled, lovers of death leaders will regain and tighten their death grips in victory. (or so they will think it's victory.)

The left divides while masking a hope for unity.

The left destroys while projecting a need for change.

The left loves conflict and hates peace.

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Again, more presumption from a lefties. Of course I know how in it's origin it was used.  it was U and ME.. I simply gave it more context and excluded the innocent. There is a difference between assumption/assuming and presumption/presuming.. Maybe open the dictionary if the contextual is a little complicated.
Click to expand...


So it isn't a wise tale but something you made up? TBF the perception given was one you didn't know what the saying was. We can't just assume you were making up a new saying.

And I am neither left nor right, liberal nor conservative.

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
For 30 years the censorship of conservative agenda and voice has been overwhelming. 

The media remains complete and utter leftist garbage. 

Corporate big shots, Musk first but now even Zuckerburg are detailing it... 

The left is corrupt. The left is hateful. The left does support domestic terror and protect the offenders from justice.

So yes, after 30 years of leftist bulls#!t and lies... yes, it feels AWESOME to throw those lies in the left's face. Still, don't cry lefties, it's very clear your hate filled, lovers of death leaders will regain and tighten their death grips in victory. (or so they will think it's victory.)

The left divides while masking a hope for unity.

The left destroys while projecting a need for change.

The left loves conflict and hates peace.
Click to expand...


Disagree. 

 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
For 30 years the censorship of conservative agenda and voice has been overwhelming. 

The media remains complete and utter leftist garbage. 

Corporate big shots, Musk first but now even Zuckerburg are detailing it... 

The left is corrupt. The left is hateful. The left does support domestic terror and protect the offenders from justice.

So yes, after 30 years of leftist bulls#!t and lies... yes, it feels AWESOME to throw those lies in the left's face. Still, don't cry lefties, it's very clear your hate filled, lovers of death leaders will regain and tighten their death grips in victory. (or so they will think it's victory.)

The left divides while masking a hope for unity.

The left destroys while projecting a need for change.

The left loves conflict and hates peace.
Click to expand...


This would require cataloging and comparing the lies spewed by the left versus the lies spewed by the right, and I don't think any intelligent person believes it shakes out like this. 

You've already given us your most trusted news source, and it's a couple of former Fox reporters who have fled to Portugal to avoid prosecution for real estate fraud. 

It there's someone else you trust -- any garbage-free truth tellers who can survive a rudimentary fact check -- I would love to read their stories of hope, unity, love, and peace. 

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
I don't think any intelligent person believes it shakes out like this. 
Click to expand...
6a492190-ee69-495e-8adc-732ee4c0e9a0_text.gif


 
Loe Doesnt Know said:
Again, more presumption from a lefties. Of course I know how in it's origin it was used.  it was U and ME.. I simply gave it more context and excluded the innocent. There is a difference between assumption/assuming and presumption/presuming.. Maybe open the dictionary if the contextual is a little complicated.
Click to expand...
Seek help.

Post jibberish and act like you’re the one that knows what’s up  :facepalm:

BTW, I hate to blow the lid off your complete life’s theory but I am not a liberal and not a democrat. Talk about assumptions…

And no, I don’t want to be friends so fúck off.

 
GSG said:
Yeah it's not even the same scenario. We didn't have a Ewers-type returning starter
Click to expand...
No no no. The Patriots did it right. Brady was the backup for Bledsoe before he became the starter so Raiola……

This is next level mensa s#!t. Nevermind that Nebraska didn’t even have a backup for Raiola let alone somebody to play in front of him.

 
I think krc's real opinion was that he would've preferred Nebraska had an older, more experienced starter so that DR could learn for a season and probably be better equipped to start in year two. As a whole, I think that's a fair opinion.

But yeah, tipping the cap to Texas was a weird and wrong comparison. And the whole thing just requires a ton of mental hurdles and hypotheticals anyways. It's not like Nebraska made a bad choice starting DR. I mean for God’s sake, they won a bowl game and 7 games for the first time in almost a decade.

You also have to remember that krc is a public dissenter of DR, too, so his take isn't that surprising.
 

krc1995 said:
And I think separation is overrated. All of the playoff teams have WR that can make catches with one or two guys draped all over them.  It’s amazing. But then the passes are like threading the needle. 
 

also I’m not bullish on DR at this point. I love what he does for the university and the fire he brings, but his lack of mobility, slow decision making, and weird choices

(example sliding way before the sticks). 
 

maybe a much improved O-line, a featured RB, and WR that can catch in traffic will improve the optics more. But then, what college QB wouldn’t be successful with those pieces? 
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Enhance said:
I think krc's real opinion was that he would've preferred Nebraska had an older, more experienced starter so that DR could learn for a season and probably be better equipped to start in year two. As a whole, I think that's a fair opinion.

But yeah, tipping the cap to Texas was a weird and wrong comparison. And the whole thing just requires a ton of mental hurdles and hypotheticals anyways. It's not like Nebraska made a bad choice starting DR. I mean for God’s sake, they won a bowl game and 7 games for the first time in almost a decade.

You also have to remember that krc is a public dissenter of DR, too, so his take isn't that surprising.
 
Click to expand...
Pretty sure he's a she, but otherwise spot on.  :D

 
Back
Top