DT Deadrin Senat [USF - Signed NLI]

Not saying JUCO's are not needed once in a while, but we are not going to build a winning legacy trying to guess on what JUCO's may pan out in a year or two. I would just as soon we punt all JUCO's and build a program from the ground up. Just saying....

GBR
We cannot become over reliant on jucos. It was one of callahan's many mistakes. That said, taking the right jucos can help immensely and is a husker tradition back to mike rozier. 2-3 per year, so long as they are of a high caliber, is a good number. Bo has done quite well in the number and quality of jucos to this point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not saying JUCO's are not needed once in a while, but we are not going to build a winning legacy trying to guess on what JUCO's may pan out in a year or two. I would just as soon we punt all JUCO's and build a program from the ground up. Just saying....

GBR
We cannot become over reliant on jucos. It was one of callahan's many mistakes. That said, taking the right jucos can help immensely and is a husker tradition back to mike rozier. 2-3 per year, so long as they are of a high caliber, is a good number. Bo has done quite well in the number and quality of jucos to this point.
The only coach I can remember thriving off of JUCOs would be Snyder at K-State.

 
Agree that Juco's should only be pursued if you have to fill a hole/need and if you can getting a 3 for 2, or 3 for 3, or those jucos that can go through spring practice are a safer bet than straight 2 for 2 fall entries. (If possible!!!) IMO if you have to get a 1/2 dozen juco's then you have issues.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top