carlfense
New member
Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()
Google. It's like magic from your computer.Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()
![]()
How so? We're talking mini-14 here, not the LEO/MIL AC 556.Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
I'll give you the first Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.How so? We're talking mini-14 here, not the LEO/MIL AC 556.Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
One is a real "assault rifle" and can shoot fully automatic. The other cannot.Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()
Actually, my understanding is that most M-16s in service are no longer fully automatic.One is a real "assault rifle" and can shoot fully automatic. The other cannot.Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()
At this point, you're referring to volume of fire, not rate of fire but I'm sure you already know this.I'll give you the first Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.How so? We're talking mini-14 here, not the LEO/MIL AC 556.Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
I'll take the second Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.
Let's see who can fire off 20 rounds first. That'd be your requested difference in firing rate.
Yeah, the A4 variant is a safe/semi/burst config. Not what the saturation on those is though.Actually, my understanding is that most M-16s in service are no longer fully automatic.One is a real "assault rifle" and can shoot fully automatic. The other cannot.Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()
Not really. Firing rate is generally reported as rounds per minute. Unless you're a heck of a lot faster at switching mags than I am I'm guessing that my effective firing rate is going to be quite a bit higher.At this point, you're referring to volume of fire, not rate of fire but I'm sure you already know this.I'll give you the first Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.How so? We're talking mini-14 here, not the LEO/MIL AC 556.Yes. It certainly is.Is the functionality of any of those 4 guns different from the others, in terms of firing rate?
I'll take the second Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.
Let's see who can fire off 20 rounds first. That'd be your requested difference in firing rate.
You guys are arguing semantics. The on paper RPM/ROF of those rifles is identical, because it's based on a hypothetical number. The real world numbers are obviously different.Not really. Firing rate is generally reported as rounds per minute. Unless you're a heck of a lot faster at switching mags than I am I'm guessing that my effective firing rate is going to be quite a bit higher.At this point, you're referring to volume of fire, not rate of fire but I'm sure you already know this.I'll give you the first Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.
I'll take the second Mini-14 on that list. Fully loaded.
Let's see who can fire off 20 rounds first. That'd be your requested difference in firing rate.
That is correct but they are still select fire, just like some M-4s so his intent is on point. That full auto thing didn't work out very well in Vietnam and sucks for accuracy anyway.Actually, my understanding is that most M-16s in service are no longer fully automatic.One is a real "assault rifle" and can shoot fully automatic. The other cannot.Dummy here ....
What's the difference between M-16 and AR-15? Myself, no difference.![]()