Danny Bateman
Donor
Shapiro talks quick and articulate, gives dubious statistics, often says "studies show" (without giving specifics on said studies), then demands precise details of people he's debating. Additionally he frames his opponents arguments in a wholly inaccurate manner, much like the ACO dancing tweet. He's quick witted and has made a living off "debating" ill prepared college students. His "Facts don't care about your feelings" trope rings rather hollow when the progressive policies he critiques as "insane" have been proven to work effectively in other first world countries.
His affiliation with Breitbart, dissemination of racist cartoons ( https://thehill.com/homenews/media/354781-ben-shapiro-apologizes-for-racist-columbus-day-video ) and recent attempts to use charities as pawns to guilt/shame people into doing something, is enough for me to say "No thanks."
I don't know much about Shapiro, so feel free to make my $0.02 with a grain or two of salt...
But my impression of him is that he realize his conservative fan base absolutely adores combativeness and clashing with "the libs" as part of their id (or half the videos I see shared of him wouldn't involve some variations of "Ben Shapiro absolutely OWNS/DESTROYS ______!" or
But much like other conservative pundits, it's pretty easy to look cool and competent when your entire career depends on maintaining a relatively controlled environment and toss out any number of pre-formulated arguments to make your opponent look foolish ("debating").
He strikes me as a pretty typical conservative pundit with a veneer of intellectualism.