The NCAA, as part of their House Settlement. The judge has said she will approve the settlement if they rewrite the roster limits part to grandfather in students currently on rosters- which will make it a real mess IMO. Most of these students have already been displaced. The NCAA initially refused to rewrite the roster limits clause, irking the judge.Admittedly, I haven't kept up with this as much as others because it simply isn't an enjoyable subject.
However, question....who exactly is pushing hard for the 105 roster limit to be totally implemented this year with no players being grandfathered in? Is it the courts? House? Some conferences/football ADs?
Admittedly, I haven't kept up with this as much as others because it simply isn't an enjoyable subject.
However, question....who exactly is pushing hard for the 105 roster limit to be totally implemented this year with no players being grandfathered in? Is it the courts? House? Some conferences/football ADs?
But, is there a group that wants it immediately and some that want a gradual adoption?I think the schools are wanting to push down the limit so there aren't as many mouths to feed with revenue sharing/NIL.
But, is there a group that wants it immediately and some that want a gradual adoption?
But why mandate a maximum? Schools don’t have to carry the max.I think the schools are wanting to push down the limit so there aren't as many mouths to feed with revenue sharing/NIL.
There’s talk of it being voluntary and up to each individual school.But, is there a group that wants it immediately and some that want a gradual adoption?
I’m perfectly fine with the max limit. The implementation was what was horrible.But why mandate a maximum? Schools don’t have to carry the max.
for me, it’s interesting to watch the NCAA openly defy a federal judge.
It’s still not implemented. The gun was jumped in part because the judge gave her preliminary approval last fall. The final approval was scheduled for April 7th, but here we are in mid May.I’m perfectly fine with the max limit. The implementation was what was horrible.
Of course it's not implemented. I'm talking about how they were going to implement it with making it immediately all in one year. That was idiotic.It’s still not implemented. The gun was jumped in part because the judge gave her preliminary approval last fall. The final approval was scheduled for April 7th, but here we are in mid May.
I'm not fine with a cap.