New feature - warning history

I got 30 days from BRI b/c of response I had towards cmhusker below. I thought 30 days was pretty excessive. The guy deserved everything he got.

"And you do exactly what you say you are not going to do. Get out of your moms basement and give your only friend a little break from your incessant yanking."

I got 3 days for a personal attack on Matty from zoogs that I can't even access. He gave me a link to attack but when I click on it now it doesn't do anything, so how did I get 3 days for nothing???

Got 3 days from Thanks Tom RR for calling posters posts in a Trev Alberts topic idiotic. I didn't call anyone an idiot, I was calling their post idiotic. Did not agree with this. Your posts and thought can be idiotic without the poster actually being an idiot. I'm proof of that......I think.

And I got 7 days from Knapp for posting "For some reason Bo has his c$%k up TMs a$$..." .  Not entirely sure about getting suspended for posting the truth.

So, in the end 3 of them I guess I could live with but BRI's for 30 days I didn't agree with at all.
You were suspended 2 other times before I suspended you. Not to rehash this situation, but it was discussed by the mods as a whole and that was the decision at the time. Sorry you disagreed with it.

 
I got 21 days for saying someone's post was moronic and he only got 7 days for for the c$%k post.

:angry:

I could've talked about c$%ks too and gotten away with it!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I got 21 days for saying someone's post was moronic and he only got 7 days for for the c$%k post.

:angry:

I could've talked about c$%ks too and gotten away with it!
:lol:  Yes, I suppose you could've taken your opportunity to talk about them.........................again! 

 
I got 21 days for saying someone's post was moronic and he only got 7 days for for the c$%k post.

:angry:

I could've talked about c$%ks too and gotten away with it!
Ha!  Who gave you the 21 days?

My longest, I think, is 7...of course I don't think that will happen anymore.

 
I got a vacation handed to me in May by AR ... looking back I stand by my comments, but I deserved the break for them.  It was in response to some video postings of Tony Laren ranting.  The OP (HuskerShark, who has since been banned) was aligned to content, but then also said "she's an intelligent person and not gonna lie, it helps that she's easy on the eyes" (which was an obvious trigger for me).

The comment that got me 7 days vacation:  "Not sure if I'd bucket you as a sexist or a misogynist but either way you're an a$$."

And AR's succinct reply -  "There's simply no reason for that."

 
I got a vacation handed to me in May by AR ... looking back I stand by my comments, but I deserved the break for them.  It was in response to some video postings of Tony Laren ranting.  The OP (HuskerShark, who has since been banned) was aligned to content, but then also said "she's an intelligent person and not gonna lie, it helps that she's easy on the eyes" (which was an obvious trigger for me).

The comment that got me 7 days vacation:  "Not sure if I'd bucket you as a sexist or a misogynist but either way you're an a$$."

And AR's succinct reply -  "There's simply no reason for that."


I think a whole bunch of the vacays around here are simply the result of people telling it like it is.

 
I forgot about HuskerShark and that 'easy on the eyes' comment.

It's like... you (you as in HuskerShark) already carry some disappointingly partisan viewpoints and, in the midst of trying to make a point few people here are going to agree with, you almost entirely depredate your argument by bringing up your opinion on her looks.

 
Fun fact - I was perusing through a previous member's warning history and saw they were given a warning years ago for calling me an 'idiot.'  :lol:

I think it'd be interesting to see which posters get others in trouble more often.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This software should allow Mods to sort things like reports filed by members, who has the most reports filed about them, who has the most warnings, most suspensions, most frequent infraction violated (almost certainly that would be Personal Attacks, although 'creating another account to circumvent a ban' is probably a close second). That would be interesting stuff to know.

 
It was actually you who issued the warning but the only reason I knew said poster called me an idiot and got a warning for it is because you mentioned it in the notes for moderators.  :lol:

 
Back
Top