Open question to the board regulars and staff

If it means that much to someone to have an avatar or sig that shows men or women in a sexually suggestive manner, more power to them. I don't feel like I have the right to complain on either side.

I would, however, draw the line at anything sexually explicit just because I don't think that is what this board would want to become.

 
BrayWyatt said:
MO Husker said:
BrayWyatt said:
Only if you can have an avatar of lesbians kissing also, equal treatment.
Click to expand...
When there are as many pictures of dudes in speedos as there are of chicks in underwear/bikinis then you can talk about equal treatment.

Jesus people need to grow up on here.
Click to expand...
Specifically talking about gays kissing avatar, you currently can't have bikini pics in your avatar or sig.
Click to expand...
http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/forum/49-daily-skin/
It's hypocritical to be a prude when it comes to pics of dudes and have an entire sub-forum dedicated to half-dressed women.

kchusker_chris said:
since the membership is likely 20-1 male, not sure where you're headed w/ this.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm calling out Bray's bullsh#t "equal treatment" comment. There is a f'ing sub-forum dedicated to almost nude pics of chicks, and we have a thread in the shed about two dudes kissing?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it in the rules that images of scantily clad men aren't allowed in the daily skin subforum, or is the lack of scantily clad men indicative of the board's demographics?

Would you feel better if there was a thread or threads dedicated to scantily clad men?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Dude said:
Is it in the rules that images of scantily clad men aren't allowed in the daily skin subforum, or is the lack of scantily clad men indicative of the board's demographics?

Would you feel better if there was a thread or threads dedicated to scantily clad men?
Click to expand...
I give 0 fu#*$ about scantily clad dudes. I just hate hypocrisy.

 
Back
Top