** Scott Frost megathread all things SF***

Status
Not open for further replies.
ColoradoHusk said:
I guess that's a fair question.  I'm sure there will be feelers put out, but are you going to be upset because a younger, less experienced head coach is hired?
Click to expand...
I will be absolutely thrilled if we hire Frost if these last five games go like I assume they will go. Absolutely thrilled. Largely for the offense that Scott runs.

 
Undone said:
It's hilarious because when I've said on this forum that we need a "first tier" coach on this forum and that Frost is not that guy, I was practically flamed.

Nice to see Chalk Talk saying the same things just from the standpoint of a sanity check about all of the Frost hysteria. The Frost hysteria is of course born out of Riley's terrible results, I get it. 
Click to expand...


You can't be first tier without having won titles of some sort. Coach Frost has potential to become a first tier coach, but nowhere near that yet. If he is able to run the table this year and go 11-0 and win the conference title game to go to 12-0, then that is respectable for a second year head coach. If he loses to USF and finishes second in his division, then you can see the upward trend. 

First tier are the likes of Saban (took a long time for him to become a first tier coach), Harbaugh, Urban Meyer, Dabo, and the like. National title winning level coaches at the college level or took an NFL team to a superbowl or won the division in the NFL (not an easy thing to do). 

 
Undone said:
I will be absolutely thrilled if we hire Frost if these last five games go like I assume they will go. Absolutely thrilled. Largely for the offense that Scott runs.
Click to expand...
Sounds good.  I would love Frost, but I also won't be jumping off the cliff if it's not Frost.  Whoever is named, I would like a coach that is on the younger side of the age-range and that has the potential to be a home run hire.

I actually thought Pelini had the potential to be great, but I didn't know he could be a complete lunatic at times.  He also didn't like the Nebraska microscope and was looking to get out of here as soon as he could.

 
ColoradoHusk said:
I actually thought Pelini had the potential to be great, but I didn't know he could be a complete lunatic at times.  He also didn't like the Nebraska microscope and was looking to get out of here as soon as he could.
Click to expand...
I know. I still haven't gotten over how Pelini was billed as a "defensive genius" but could never craft a B1G defense designed to stop Wisconsin's smashmouth offense.

 
Undone said:
I will be absolutely thrilled if we hire Frost if these last five games go like I assume they will go. Absolutely thrilled. Largely for the offense that Scott runs.
Click to expand...
I would love to see a mix of what Frost runs wt a bit of TO thrown in.   Throwing in some old school option would keep the D guessing and off balance - Scott says he still pulls for those options schools when he isn't playing them.   Watching the video of the 97  CCG you see how TO would set the D up and then all of a sudden burn them wt a deep pass on a play option pass.  

 
jessica0 said:
You can't be first tier without having won titles of some sort. Coach Frost has potential to become a first tier coach, but nowhere near that yet. If he is able to run the table this year and go 11-0 and win the conference title game to go to 12-0, then that is respectable for a second year head coach. If he loses to USF and finishes second in his division, then you can see the upward trend.
Click to expand...
Agreed. If he wins his conference, that is officially "recent success" and impressive success at that. 

Moos' reputation would make you assume he'll consider all options. I will assume that if Frost is named it's because he truly was the best option available. And if that happens, I will be very happy. 

I just don't see Riley making the staff changes necessary to make things work. 

 
TGHusker said:
I would love to see a mix of what Frost runs wt a bit of TO thrown in.   Throwing in some old school option would keep the D guessing and off balance - Scott says he still pulls for those options schools when he isn't playing them.   Watching the video of the 97  CCG you see how TO would set the D up and then all of a sudden burn them wt a deep pass on a play option pass.  
Click to expand...
In my humble opinion, it's better to spend practice time with your mobile quarterback throwing the ball in place of that same practice time being spent on practicing option plays in addition to the base zone read option plays.

I just don't see it as necessary at all. I see it simply playing into the nostalgia factor for our fan base which feels good and all, but isn't actually practical or necessary.

Again, just my opinion. I could be wrong.

 
Undone said:
It's hilarious because when I've said on this forum that we need a "first tier" coach on this forum and that Frost is not that guy, I was practically flamed.

Nice to see Chalk Talk saying the same things just from the standpoint of a sanity check about all of the Frost hysteria. The Frost hysteria is of course born out of Riley's terrible results, I get it. 
Click to expand...
Frost is a “first tier” coach.... Chalk Talk can kiss my butt.

i was just messing with you last time... it’s okay to want a $7 million coach but guarantees nothing IMO ... except maybe he’s a shoe contract cheater who mysteriously gets all the recruits.

 
jessica0 said:
First tier are the likes of Saban (took a long time for him to become a first tier coach), Harbaugh, Urban Meyer, Dabo, and the like. National title winning level coaches at the college level or took an NFL team to a superbowl or won the division in the NFL (not an easy thing to do). 
Click to expand...




Jim Harbaugh is certainly not a first tier coach. At least not in college, and at least not yet. 

 
Landlord said:
Jim Harbaugh is certainly not a first tier coach. At least not in college, and at least not yet. 
Click to expand...
 
JH is without a doubt Tier 1. Mike Riley would be a Tier Z compared to JH. 


2004


San Diego


7–4


4–1


2nd


 


 


 


2005


San Diego


11–1


4–0


1st


 


 


 


2006


San Diego


11–1


7–0


1st


 


 


 


San Diego:


29–6


15–1


 


Stanford Cardinal (Pacific-10 Conference) (2007–2010)


2007


Stanford


4–8


3–6


T–7th


 


 


 


2008


Stanford


5–7


4–5


T–6th


 


 


 


2009


Stanford


8–5


6–3


T–2nd


L Sun


 


 


2010


Stanford


12–1


8–1


2nd


W Orange†

4


4


Stanford:


29–21


21–15


 


Michigan Wolverines (Big Ten Conference) (2015–present)


2015


Michigan


10–3


6–2


3rd (East)


W Citrus


11


12


2016


Michigan


10–3


7–2


3rd (East)


L Orange†

10


10


2017


Michigan


5–2


2–2


(East)


 


 


 


Michigan:


25–8


15–6


 


Total:


83–35


 


      National championship         Conference title         Conference division title












eam


Year


Regular season


Post season


Won


Lost


Ties


Win %


Finish


Won


Lost


Win %


Result


SF


2011


13


3


0


.813


1st in NFC West


1


1


.500


Lost to New York Giants in NFC Championship Game


SF


2012


11


4


1


.719


1st in NFC West


2


1


.667


Lost to Baltimore Ravens in Super Bowl XLVII


SF


2013


12


4


0


.750


2nd in NFC West


2


1


.667


Lost to Seattle Seahawks in NFC Championship Game


SF


2014


8


8


0


.500


3rd in NFC West


-


-


-


Did Not Qualify


SF Total


44


19


1


.690


 


5


3


.625


 


Total


44


19


1


.690


 


5


3


.625


 
No and if he loses to all three this year and again next year, he will be at Youngstown State.  Wolverine fans are not happy with their savior.  But maybe it just takes more than being from Michigan or even (gasp) Nebraska to win.

We had a 1st tier coach and we fired him.  Duh!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top