BigRedBuster
Active member
That is DEFINITELY not happening in that clip.Finally took the time to go find it:
That is DEFINITELY not happening in that clip.Finally took the time to go find it:
Need to go ahead and eliminate contact with the long snapper all together during field goals. Extremely dangerous for the neckFinally took the time to go find it:
I agree. I actually thought that was the rule, but that may be for punts. It's very hard to judge that the rushers up the middle are taking a second to wait before making contact with the long-snapper. It could be argued that those rushers are making contact with the guards first, and then moving into the center. It seems very challenging to officiate, especially if a team does block a kick, and then have it overturned by a penalty.Need to go ahead and eliminate contact with the long snapper all together during field goals. Extremely dangerous for the neck
Or at least until they lift their head. I always thought that was the rule. The one second thing seems stupid for the defense and the snapper.Need to go ahead and eliminate contact with the long snapper all together during field goals. Extremely dangerous for the neck
Looks like McCallum powered the ball through the right hand of #96.Yeah it almost does looks like the ball changes direction. Then again it could be just how he kicked the ball. That was pretty cool.
I’ve always wondered why coaches don’t have the kickers kick from 10 yards back (instead of 7) on kicks which are basically chip shots. I understand it creates a challenge for the snapper, but an extra 3 yards would enable the kicker to get the ball up and over a block in the middle and create more distance from blockers coming off the edge.I have always wondered why coaches dont go out and find 2 or 3, 6'8" + dudes and offer them partial schollies or walk on perks simply to just come out and line up and jump up and block kicks...they dont even have to be all that athletic...get the back up center from bball team or whatever.
Wonder if 7 yards has been determined to be the most optimal angle to block your outside rushers for your end guys...maybe anything more gives them more of a straight line to rush the kick instead of having to turn an angle to get thereI’ve always wondered why coaches don’t have the kickers kick from 10 yards back (instead of 7) on kicks which are basically chip shots. I understand it creates a challenge for the snapper, but an extra 3 yards would enable the kicker to get the ball up and over a block in the middle and create more distance from blockers coming off the edge.
Wonder if 7 yards has been determined to be the most optimal angle to block your outside rushers for your end guys...maybe anything more gives them more of a straight line to rush the kick instead of having to turn an angle to get there
7 yards is the minimum per the rule book. NFL seems to have generally gone to 8.
It would probably be easier for guys to run around the end and block it if you go farther back. The (slightly) increased distance would be more than offset by being able to run in more of a straight line instead of around a corner.