Or what tough guy? :box There's a PM link for me if you have anything else to say, otherwise we've thread jacked this enough.It's also illegal to drive 1 mile over the posted speed limit, that doesn't mean you will always be charged for it.
Not getting charged with a DUI means they don't have enough to prosecute, it doesn't mean that he didn't break the law.
If everyone was charged every time they broke a law, the legal system would crumble.
Really? You can't be serious.
Lets see, how much evidence is required to cite someone for a DUI/DWA?
I know, let's measure their BAC by administering a breathalyzer test or a blood sample!!!11
You're reaching with your BS loopholes and interpretations.
He was given a breathalyzer test, and it was .035, which is .045 under the legal limit. It has been established by the state that .08 is the limit where motor skills are impaired to an appreciable degree. Therefore, you are not breaking the law.
If the officer gave a field test and he didn't notice any motor impairment, then you are not breaking the law.
I'd advise you to stop while you're ahead, instead of stooping to semantics to try to prove you're right.
Sorry to the mods and everyone else who had to read our arguments. I'll try to keep it in PM's from now on.
:wasted :backtotopic
Last edited by a moderator: