https://twitter.com/Jimrosehuskers/status/660060714426638336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Getting called out...it is about time!
It's really kind of childish to try to scapegoat your former coach. I'm sure some people think they look intelligent doing their revisionist history but really they don't. Bo wasn't the greatest, wasn't the worst. If he hadn't been fired and had the meeting with the p and c words, most people wouldn't be shouting all the vitriol and blaming him for the deficiencies of this current staff that has more experience than Methuselah and was predicted to make everything great again. It seems like there's always a group that engages in this crap and they'll probably be trashing Riley if it doesn't work out.It fits the narrative so people will push that agenda.You don't have to talk to the recent players this year to realize Bo was bad for the team.
Tom Osborne was around Pelini a lot. He had an opportunity to hire Gill and he had an opportunity to fire Pelini. Instead, he doubled down on him and also endorsed him for subsequent jobs.
Why do some Husker fans insist believing they know more about Nebraska football success than Tom Osborne? What sort of arrogance does that require?
And this is and will always be a fundamental divide in husker nation.There's getting to be a decent list of fail lying at the man's feet. When posters claim so and so are against the program and are sabotaging it, it almost appears they're placing blame on the wrong person. He's had a hand in some pretty dismal hires the past couple of decades.Which part?Wrong again.Ok, he strongly suggested Pederson and people like you, who think he's a god, followed his wishes. Pederson was hired because Osborne said so. Just because he was a great coach doesn't mean he's good at choosing/judging other people.
http://m.journalstar.com/sports/columnists/sipple/steven-m-sipple-osborne-s-sense-of-calm-will-be/article_4728be79-4ff7-5d81-9b58-4d61ccf004d4.html?mobile_touch=true
Neither frank nor Bo were dismal hires.
Not at all complicated when you realize the one big factor that changed this season.Even I thought the secondary would be better.
Then I watched them play this season and realized I was wrong.
Not complicated.
Sorry.Now you're just making stuff up.There's also not a college football analyst in America who didn't declare Nebraska's secondary young, thin, unproven and a major liability before the season.
no he couldntFunny that he could complete screen passes last year... perhaps receivers, particularly running backs, aren't getting in the right position to receive those plays? Similar to how TA sometimes breaks pocket improperly.
If Bo had beaten Wisconsin last year, he could have said f**k you to Shawn Eichorst's face and still had the job.I think it's funny how many people here still think Bo was fired for not winning.
Yep. Exactly.It's really kind of childish to try to scapegoat your former coach. I'm sure some people think they look intelligent doing their revisionist history but really they don't. Bo wasn't the greatest, wasn't the worst. If he hadn't been fired and had the meeting with the p and c words, most people wouldn't be shouting all the vitriol and blaming him for the deficiencies of this current staff that has more experience than Methuselah and was predicted to make everything great again. It seems like there's always a group that engages in this crap and they'll probably be trashing Riley if it doesn't work out.It fits the narrative so people will push that agenda.You don't have to talk to the recent players this year to realize Bo was bad for the team.
Tom Osborne was around Pelini a lot. He had an opportunity to hire Gill and he had an opportunity to fire Pelini. Instead, he doubled down on him and also endorsed him for subsequent jobs.
Why do some Husker fans insist believing they know more about Nebraska football success than Tom Osborne? What sort of arrogance does that require?
Yep. Steve Pedersen was the hot national AD candidate with Nebraska roots. He was the Scott Frost of AD hires and Nebraska fans generally thought we scored on that one.Osborne hired Pedersen to be his Assoc AD for football (basically his Jamrog) and his tecruiting coordinator for a couple years in the 90s. Also gave a string rec for pedersen for AD. Ive been told how ironic it was that TO took Pedersens place when it was TOs words that got Steve the job to begin with.
Lots of clips in these BTN specials on Brook and 94 that happen to show Pedersen roaming the sideline.
Yes, Steve Pedersen was a NEBRASKA GUY. GASP!!!!!
Solich failed. Pedersen failed. Bo failed. Miles and Erstad are each one more shitshow away from very hot seats. Its possible to be a great coach and great person and simply not be good at evaluating and selecting coaches. On the other end of that spectrum. TO didnt want Bo anyway. Bigshots did. And they run the show.
No doubt?We would be 8-0 if Bo was still here. I have no doubt.
Last 8 games last year we went 4-4
So the answer to firing Pelini and making a rash choice in Riley, is to hire the guy with no HC experience who's been running someone else's pass-happy offense in Oregon, or the coach of Liberty University with the 52-67 career record?If NU tanks this seasons, i.e., loses out, this staff should be summarily fired and Frost or gill or just about anyone else should be brought in.