HuskerNation1
New member
I’ve stated many times, that not all or even most of the main stream media is fake
whst I clearly stated was some of it was, so you have to question it all. One of the main culprits is what they decide to cover and not cover, it’s laughable how much or little attention they pay to things based on their narrative.
I’m no trump fan, I think he’s an egotistical blowhard that isn’t very wise about how he conducts himself. However the vile hatred he is shown, the piling on and never giving him credit for anything is just too much. I despise the guy, but seriously considering voting for him out of spite this time because of the bias.
I am not sure why this topic is being allowed in the football forum, but if so, I agree with you regarding the anti-Trump media bias. A study just published last week shows he has gotten 150 times more negative coverage than his opponent, and it doens't really require one to have to look to these data points to come to that conclusion. If you simply look at the questions he receives at a press conference you will see the media is far more hostile and view it as their job to take him down. One reporter last week asked the POTUS if he felt he should apologize to the American people for lying to the country. This was an actual question from a White House press reporter...it was someone from Huff Post which I have no idea why they are even allowed in the press room.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2020/08/17/study-150-times-more-negative-news-trump-biden
I think a primary example of this just occurred with a very noteworthy UAB/Israeli peace agreement which would be getting Nobel recommendations if he had a D in front of his name, but it was barely covered on many mainstream networks. And I agree that your or many others are likely to change minds in here. The President could find a cure for cancer and would still be trashed or marginalized because he sent a tweet the same day they did not agree with.