The Courts (not specific to either party)

Fru said:
ONE bad man? Dude. C’mon.
Click to expand...
It has a lot more to do with millions of voters who enable his behavior in the name of moronic culture war nonsense.

Trump is probably going to be found to be immune from prosecution for trying to overthrow Democracy, won't end up in jail, and because the average voter is stupid beyond comprehension, he's likely to win in November.

 
BigRedBuster said:
I'm old enough to remember Republicans arguing that they shouldn't impeach Trump because it's a legal issue and we should all let the courts decide this after he leaves office.

NOW....they argue that he can't be held accountable in court unless he was impeached.

Amazing how this works.
Click to expand...
Isn’t it his lawyers job to make these arguments on his behalf?  Even if they end of losing said arguments.  

 
Archy1221 said:
Isn’t it his lawyers job to make these arguments on his behalf?  Even if they end of losing said arguments.  
Click to expand...
Republicans in congress are his personal lawyers?  Sure, his actual lawyer can make that case during the impeachment hearings, but MAGA congressmen were making the case right along with them.....it was all total BS.

 
BigRedBuster said:
Republicans in congress are his personal lawyers?  Sure, his actual lawyer can make that case during the impeachment hearings, but MAGA congressmen were making the case right along with them.....it was in total BS.
Click to expand...
No, Republicans in Congress are not his personal lawyers.   
 

I don’t believe the President has absolute immunity, it is an interesting case to follow though, and I’d have to look up which members of Congress are making those statements beyond the MTG’s and Boebarts of the world.  

 
Archy1221 said:
Isn’t it his lawyers job to make these arguments on his behalf?  Even if they end of losing said arguments.  
Click to expand...
At a certain point, shouldn't a person look themselves in the mirror and say "wow, I'm actually going to step in front of SCOTUS and say that attempting a coup attempt, ordering the military to commit a coup, or assassinating a political rival should be allowed by Presidential immunity. Maybe this entire political movement is f#&%ing stupid, enabled by the lowest dredges of society, and I probably shouldn't be doing this"

I realize looking into the mirror and asking difficult questions is kind of difficult for a certain voter who enabled all this, but lets be honest here - Trump is a catastrophic idiot enabled by elements of society who cheer his anti-American authoritarianism on because it OwNs teH LiBs. 

 
Dr. Strangelove said:
At a certain point, shouldn't a person look themselves in the mirror and say "wow, I'm actually going to step in front of SCOTUS and say that attempting a coup attempt, ordering the military to commit a coup, or assassinating a political rival should be allowed by Presidential immunity. Maybe this entire political movement is f#&%ing stupid, enabled by the lowest dredges of society, and I probably shouldn't be doing this"
Click to expand...
Do you even understand what a defense attorney does?  
 

Does this mean the argument is going to win?  Hopefully not, but that is their job when they take the job. 
 

 
commando said:
mafia attorneys defend their bosses 
Click to expand...
The primary difference being that, in this instance, it sets a precedent for authoritarianism. 

Archy1221 said:
Do you even understand what a defense attorney does?  
 

Does this mean the argument is going to win?  Hopefully not, but that is their job when they take the job. 
Click to expand...
See above. Congrats on creating this. Wish I could say that it was difficult to see coming and that Trump really veered off course, but you know, decades of being a piece of s#!t kind of eliminates that excuse. 

 
The circular logic to authoritarianism

Impeachment is not the vehicle to deal with, for example an insurrectionist, the judicial system is.   But the judicial system is not that vehicle because the president has broad immunity and the president must first be impeached and convicted.   :facepalm:


 
Scarlet said:
The circular logic to authoritarianism

Impeachment is not the vehicle to deal with, for example an insurrectionist, the judicial system is.   But the judicial system is not that vehicle because the president has broad immunity and the president must first be impeached and convicted.   :facepalm:
Click to expand...
I think the frame work that a sitting president can't be tried until impeached is sound. If not you would have a never ending load of cases against every president for any conceivable slight. That said once they become a normal citizen again impeachment would no longer be necessary, and cases should go straight to court.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top