walksalone
New member
I like this, weeks later and you still come off as the gay best friend preaching to Bo as Katherine Hiegel after yet another letdown.

I like this, weeks later and you still come off as the gay best friend preaching to Bo as Katherine Hiegel after yet another letdown.
Okay, I just finished the Breaking Bad series and I now have no doubt Saunders, you are smoking the 99% pure blue meth. What in the f#*k is going on with you lately? Not that I've ever really agreed with much you say, but first you declare Michigan State's Confernce Championahip invalid because they lost their bowl game to Alabam, but now you say Zac Lee and Tommy Armstrong are in the same realm of speed. What the f#*k man. Put down the pipe.Yeah but that's HS recruiting times. Tommy is closer to Zac Lee speed than TM. His running strength is agility, not speed.Rivals has Tommy at a 4.5 40. Taylor "burner" Martinez was listed at a 4.47.I don't think he is way off base at all. I know people love to talk about how well TA runs the option but I guess I did not see it all that much. Teams will let him run and key the option back, because TA is not really a burner AND because there is no proven guy behind him.
Now, with that being said...TA might be a "winner" some guys just win...I don't know why but they do...
I think Tommy has plenty of speed.
I think it's weird you call Bo's crank "blue meth"Okay, I just finished the Breaking Bad series and I now have no doubt Saunders, you are smoking the 99% pure blue meth. What in the f#*k is going on with you lately? Not that I've ever really agreed with much you say, but first you declare Michigan State's Confernce Championahip invalid because they lost their bowl game to Alabam, but now you say Zac Lee and Tommy Armstrong are in the same realm of speed. What the f#*k man. Put down the pipe.Yeah but that's HS recruiting times. Tommy is closer to Zac Lee speed than TM. His running strength is agility, not speed.Rivals has Tommy at a 4.5 40. Taylor "burner" Martinez was listed at a 4.47.I don't think he is way off base at all. I know people love to talk about how well TA runs the option but I guess I did not see it all that much. Teams will let him run and key the option back, because TA is not really a burner AND because there is no proven guy behind him.
Now, with that being said...TA might be a "winner" some guys just win...I don't know why but they do...
I think Tommy has plenty of speed.
People would have to be dumb to answer this question....<proceeds to answer question>
I'm not sure that was such a good idea, calling him out like that...Glad I'm not the only one who found hilarity in devnet doing that.
Okay, I just finished the Breaking Bad series and I now have no doubt Saunders, you are smoking the 99% pure blue meth. What in the f#*k is going on with you lately? Not that I've ever really agreed with much you say, but first you declare Michigan State's Confernce Championahip invalid because they lost their bowl game to Alabam, but now you say Zac Lee and Tommy Armstrong are in the same realm of speed. What the f#*k man. Put down the pipe.Yeah but that's HS recruiting times. Tommy is closer to Zac Lee speed than TM. His running strength is agility, not speed.Rivals has Tommy at a 4.5 40. Taylor "burner" Martinez was listed at a 4.47.I don't think he is way off base at all. I know people love to talk about how well TA runs the option but I guess I did not see it all that much. Teams will let him run and key the option back, because TA is not really a burner AND because there is no proven guy behind him.
Now, with that being said...TA might be a "winner" some guys just win...I don't know why but they do...
I think Tommy has plenty of speed.
That's absolutely fantastic.It was a joke, I don't know the guy at all so I can't say he smokes meth or not, but I'm gonna assume he doesn't. I had just finished the Breaking Bad series and just had a burning desire to reference blue meth.
How much time did you spend to find a month old post to quote me here? I thought things were going better for you out there? I remember the day you left. Standing at the end of the driveway hitch hiking. I had just shown you the difference between sh#t and shinola. Remember the night before you discovered rhythm. Anyway, you hopped in that truck and hitchhiked to the end of the fence out front, I knew it would take you awhile, but you made it. You've joined the circus, you met that sweet girl who tattooed your name on her a$$. She's a he'll of a stunt woman, a bit possessive though. We really appreciate the few bucks you send home every month. Keep working hard at that gas station and watch out for those exploding oil cans.
I truly hope someday you find your special purpose.
How much time did you spend to find a month old post to quote me here?
How much time did you spend to find a month old post to quote me here?
It was only 5 posts up man.
RKIII played a lot better than Tommy when looking at the entire season.
Anyways, I saw some tweets talking about rumors of a two-qb system like last year being a possibility, and also one personal ESPN radio guys' opinion that the order should go Tommy/Johnny/Ryker.
I get the idea that we might see something like 2012 where if Tommy goes down, Ryker might be the 'better' quarterback, but Johnny would get the nod to be the guy in games because he fits the offense better, the same way Tommy likely might have been the better pick if Taylor got dinged up in '12, but Kellogg was 2nd string as long as it was just mop-up duty.
I have no problem with 'peaceful' protesters getting gassed ALL DAY LONG. . .
I don't really know what he's talking about with the whole Johnny getting the nod in front of Ryker and what he's really basing it on. In my opinion, and I live in Grand Island and have seen Ryker in action many times, Ryker would do just fine with the first team offense.RKIII played a lot better than Tommy when looking at the entire season.
Anyways, I saw some tweets talking about rumors of a two-qb system like last year being a possibility, and also one personal ESPN radio guys' opinion that the order should go Tommy/Johnny/Ryker.
I get the idea that we might see something like 2012 where if Tommy goes down, Ryker might be the 'better' quarterback, but Johnny would get the nod to be the guy in games because he fits the offense better, the same way Tommy likely might have been the better pick if Taylor got dinged up in '12, but Kellogg was 2nd string as long as it was just mop-up duty.