Or death toll in Puerto Rico from hurricane Maria. Very accurate with numbersWell, that doesn't seem right. Trump is always so precise with numbers.
Remember his inauguration, where he didn't fudge the size of the crowds at all?
There's also the problem of how long any immunity from getting the disease lasts. Other coronaviruses have had immunity that lasted as little as a year, but people who recovered from SARS had much longer immunity. Then there's the chance that the virus will mutate taking away any immunity. And the more people who get infected, the more chances for a problematic mutation.These guys seem like experts and ultimately I think they are right but I wonder how the 'on' switch would be activated. It says no more than 37.5 cases per 10,000, that's around 1.2 million cases. First of all, that seems like alot considering we are barely handling 50,000 cases. Secondly, when would you activate the distancing? When we reach this number? Because at that point alot more are actually infected than that number and they won't show for up to 14 days. Is that taken into account?
How likely is this virus to mutate?
It seems it already has.
This graph represents the different mutations of the virus. You can see that the initial strains started in purple in China and then spread. Each time you see a branching on the left graph, that is a mutation leading to a slightly different variant of the virus.
Had not seen that mutation chart yet, thanks for sharing. I've been seeing a misconception out there that this is NOT mutating. The opposite seems to be true. Do viruses usually mutate this quickly, is this a normal thing?There's also the problem of how long any immunity from getting the disease lasts. Other coronaviruses have had immunity that lasted as little as a year, but people who recovered from SARS had much longer immunity. Then there's the chance that the virus will mutate taking away any immunity. And the more people who get infected, the more chances for a problematic mutation.
![]()
Trump's entire political career is based on spreading false, deceptive and misleading information about his opponents. This is a hoot!
And the threat of "consequences." Like... what? A lawsuit that will never see the inside of a courtroom?
If I were a TV station that received this letter, I'd play that ad once per hour, on the house.