I’ve always wondered how effective masking would’ve been if, you know, the other 40% of people would have actually worn the damn things out in public. And then I wonder how much more effective it would have been if they had been correctly worn N95s instead of chin diaper POS masks. Oh well, maybe there will be another pandemic sometime to provide another opportunity to see how well actual compliance actually works.
The first "mask" I wore was a doubled up neck gaiter. After that it was cloth masks from Amazon. Didn't start wearing the N95 masks until much later, when stores weren't constantly sold out.
America was completely unprepared for a pandemic like this. Sad thing is, not only have we not learned anything, half the country is sure we've learned the wrong things and will actively push back on future directives from the CDC.
Republicans politicizing everything about the pandemic really bolloxed this whole thing. Extra death stats very much bear that out. For a country that tells itself it's the greatest country in the world, we certainly showed our a$$ during the pandemic.
The amount of vitriol all the way up to death threats that legit virologists, epidemiologists, and public health officials received over the past three years is easy to see in real time by looking at the timeline on some of their Twitter feeds. If anti-vax, anti-masker, and anti any mitigation steps wackos had their way we'd jump back 200 years when our life expectancy was 35 years.
It absolutely does not bode well for the next time a coronavirus jumps species to humans or whatever else will inevitably come our way. But as long as there's political hay to be made by the likes of our next President, Desantis, they will continue to seek "advice" from the crazies like the dermatologist Covid advisor he has that wants to put Fauci in front of a firing squad.
While also pointing out she wouldn’t expect different results based on it being Covid instead of Flu or SARS :thumbsShe's pointing out that the Cochran study was mainly based on studies conducted BEFORE the covid pandemic
Kinda one of the points they don’t work. :facepalm:And the study doesn't take into account whether masking mandates were complied with
It would be quite fair to say this language is attached to a great deal of studies with post hoc analysis. Doesn’t make the data inside it any differentBecause the folks at Cochrane are responsible scientists, they are reluctant to draw the firm conclusions that the Daily Mail loves to turn into clickbait.
I’m sure you will soon be presenting your findings that the mask mandates were a boon to fighting Covid spread. If you aren’t too busy making clown memes that is. :snacks:
Yes, masks reduce the spread of COVID
There is strong and consistent evidence for the effectiveness of masks and (even more so) respirators in protecting against respiratory infections. Masks are an important protection against serious infections.
A systematic review is only as good as the rigour it employs in combining similar studies of similar interventions, with similar measurement of outcomes. When very different studies of different interventions are combined, the results are not informative.
The people in your group 1 scenario on Huskerboard certainly aren’t. They are actively ignoring data from the gold standard in large study post hoc analysis and instead learning how to do clown memes :facepalm:Hopefully, everyone has learned from the experience. The problem is, most of the people in group one, probably are looking at science and learning from it.
Good lord will you ever figure out what the discussion is about :bangLike clockwork it arrives and by all means continues to prove that the study in question was not read and if it was was, not understood. Double down to avoid ever admitting being out of it's element. A hallmark symptom.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254560/leading-causes-of-death-in-the-us-average-number-daily/
The compliance rate makes the mandates pointless.