What mandates?
Because he wants to be a dictator and f#&% you if you get in his way.I'm not arguing one way or the other on the mandates. But, why shouldn't a state be able to have these if they want them?
I mean I could see an argument about vehicles on federally funded roads, maybe, maybe.... But the Constitution is pretty clear on state's rights and State's have all kinds of different vehicular laws (speed limits, weight limits, licensing display laws, emissions testing, noise, and on, and on)I'm not arguing one way or the other on the mandates. But, why shouldn't a state be able to have these if they want them?
Exactly. The only reason he's doing this is because he doesn't like California and wants to go against everything they want.I mean I could see an argument about vehicles on federally funded roads, maybe, maybe.... But the Constitution is pretty clear on state's rights and State's have all kinds of different vehicular laws (speed limits, weight limits, licensing display laws, emissions testing, noise, and on, and on)
No. No way. A petulant fit throwing child you say? The President of The United States?Exactly. The only reason he's doing this is because he doesn't like California and wants to go against everything they want.
he is attacking California much harder than he is russia.I'm not arguing one way or the other on the mandates. But, why shouldn't a state be able to have these if they want them?