It’s somewhat valid- but he wants to start all over? There are no guarantees anywhere else unless he demotes the level of the team.
Well bc Satterfield still in the building and he probably despises him and doesn't want to be around him.
If someone is playing the $$ game, then we can "control" it to an extent by offering more $ obviously, but if it is "hurt feelings" about playing time, welp..... you can't offer more playing time, bc then you are either a coach who is held prisoner by a promise or one who goes back on your promise. Playing time is non-negotiable. Can't help "feelings", except the new OC and HC extending an olive branch, which I am sure has been done.
You said it better than I did. With an X name like $emoney, might be a hint. Still not sure he leaves.
Money is always a factor for everyone to at least some extent. However, Emmett's case is apparently tied to feeling misused. Carriker's comments (here) were pretty informative without divulging too many details. Tie that in with Holgo's press conference comments about coaches sticking to their favorites too often. Having an outsider (Holgo) come in and cut through any favoritism or worrying about recruitment or seniority ties/promises made a clear difference and allowed Emmett to excel, much like he did late last season.
reminiscent of the Shawn Watson thread from back in the day.
Sure, but we shouldn't just dismiss productive players for looking around either, especially when they often went overlooked here. Again, I hope he comes back because I think he's talented and a very good leader for the program.
I understand that Dana is trying to mend fences but what about Matt Rhule? He is the head coach and should try to be fixing things as well. I understand he has a lot on his plate as a head coach but if any of the things about Satt are true then he should be held accountable too.
