I'm not the biggest fan of that guy either but you really need to take it easy when responding to him. You can disagree without calling him "clueless" or other such terms.
You have some good things to say but you've already racked up three warning points in the last month and were bordering on a fourth. That's not a good pattern.
Make your point without belittling other posters. Thanks.
He needs to learn that you can disagree without becoming hostile about it. He seems to take it as a personal affront when anyone expresses an opinion contrary to his own.Was bordering on his fourth Warning this month but zoogs and I decided it didn't quite rise to that level.
Sent the following PM regarding a couple of his reply to @eightlaces
I'm not the biggest fan of that guy either but you really need to take it easy when responding to him. You can disagree without calling him "clueless" or other such terms.
You have some good things to say but you've already racked up three warning points in the last month and were bordering on a fourth. That's not a good pattern.
Make your point without belittling other posters. Thanks.
IMO, ban both these clowns and the angst level goes way down. They seem responsible for a good amount of the thread derailments.Really? Riley bashing again when it was clear the game plan would have beat IOWA if not for an incompetent quarterback. The same one that lost the Illinois gameAnyone who think Iowa is elite should look at their four year running average. They lucked out win a favorable schedule and a Riley coached Nebraska. It's not surprising they put together a good single season. But hardly elite.
Oh, so you would have a complex set of rules about which schools would owe scholarships and when based on the outcome you want to engineer, even if that means freezing a student athelete's ability to pursue what may be a better option for him.
Just out of curiosity, are you a democrat?