Elon Musk Neo Nazi ties

Yo, can I get a conservative poster in here to spin this for me?@Archy1221? I have to mentally prepare myself for the insane talking points I'm going to be hearing for the next few years.
Who is Jonatan Pallesen? 
 

on a side note, you literally just made it through 4 years of insane Democrat talking points, even contributing to them.   You’ll be fine👍

Just sit back and relax.   Or don’t.   Either way, don’t care much what you do, though it’s fun to see the freak out posts.  Really really looking forward to the next three years of it.   Like really looking forward to it.    

 
Who is Jonatan Pallesen? 
 

on a side note, you literally just made it through 4 years of insane Democrat talking points, even contributing to them.   You’ll be fine👍

Just sit back and relax.   Or don’t.   Either way, don’t care much what you do, though it’s fun to see the freak out posts.  Really really looking forward to the next three years of it.   Like really looking forward to it.    
The fact that you rationalize what's happening because the "dEmZ diD iT" is just partisan laziness. I'm disappointed. But hey, you are more than welcome to post links to when the Democrats allowed George Soros to s#!t on the constitution and rampage through government. 

I admit: if the Republican Party has devolved into becoming Elon Musk's personal b!^@h and twists itself to accept the worst elements of white nationalism, I do think it's a fitting reflection on its constituency. 

Some of us are conservative but not Trumpian Nationalists masquerading as conservative.   It is the Trumpian Nationalists who you should be admonishing to never vote again for the sake of the country and the world.  I've probably moved more to the moderate but would prefer a more traditional conservative but nothing of the trump/MAGA ilk. 
Fair enough. I'm considerably more conservative than the average Democrat voter as well. Unfortunately I'm cursed to think about the world that extends beyond my mailbox when I'm in a voting booth, so I vote for Democrats.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The fact that you rationalize what's happening because the "dEmZ diD iT" is just partisan laziness. I'm disappointed. But hey, you are more than welcome to post links to when the Democrats allowed George Soros to s#!t on the constitution and rampage through government. 

I admit: if the Republican Party has devolved into becoming Elon Musk's personal b!^@h and twists itself to accept the worst elements of white nationalism, I do think it's a fitting reflection on its constituency. 
 Btw….you never answered who Jonatan Pallesen was since he’s the subject of something you wanted me to talk about?   

 
Well, just look at this DA election initiative across the country.   
Yes, because this is the same as an unappointed person violating the constitution by using 20 year olds as legal shields to illegally end appropriated programs by Congress on a whim.

 Btw….you never answered who Jonatan Pallesen was since he’s the subject of something you wanted me to talk about?   
Based on his twitter bio, he's an anti-immigrant racists that the current leader of the MAGA movement - Musk - is agreeing with on Twitter. You seem to want to dismiss and rationalize the OBVIOUS malignant elements of the Republican party, so I saw it fit to point out that Shadow President Musk is agreeing with the s#!tty racists he promotes on his platform.

Look, it sucks that deeply racist people have all coalesced around one political party. But if you want to include them in your electoral tent, you should call them out instead of rationalize why it's acceptable.

 
This explains a lot. USAID went from an underfunded, understaffed agency with Republicans begging for funding, to this evil agency needing to be "fed to the woodchipper."

What prompted that change?

Funny story...


USAID Was Investigating Starlink’s Contracts in Ukraine




Since coming into power, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has barraged USAID, the international aid agency that dispenses food and supplies to nations all over the world. It is likely that the agency will soon be shuttered and could be subsumed into the U.S. State Department. Now, new reporting shows USAID was actually investigating equipment from one of Musk’s companies at the time that he attacked the agency.

The Lever reported Tuesday that USAID’s inspector general was in the process of investigating its own public-private partnership between Musk’s Starlink and the Ukrainian government at the time that the billionaire’s DOGE crippled the agency. Publicly available information about that probe is still online. An announcement from last May reads: “The USAID Office of Inspector General, Inspections and Evaluations Division, is initiating an inspection of USAID’s oversight of Starlink satellite terminals provided to the Government of Ukraine. Our objectives are to determine how (1) the Government of Ukraine used the USAID-provided Starlink terminals, and (2) USAID monitored the Government of Ukraine’s use of USAID-provided Starlink terminals.”

Musk has called the agency “evil” and a “criminal organization,” though the fact that USAID was investigating the Starlink activities may suggest ulterior motivations for the billionaire’s vitriol. It’s unclear what the Starlink probe’s status is right now.


 


Musk’s “criminal” remarks are funny since it increasingly looks like Musk’s DOGE activities represent breaches of federal law and, therefore, may be construed as rampant criminal behavior. On Tuesday, the Washington Post noted that officials at half a dozen federal agencies had raised concerns over whether what Musk was doing was illegal. Those agencies included the “Treasury Department, the Education Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development, the General Services Administration, the Office of Personnel Management, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the White House budget office, among others,” the newspaper reported.

 
Elon Musk wants to throw everyone on 60 Minutes in jail for a long prison sentence! Very free speech of bro
This is why you can’t trust any of the Silicon Valley  techbro libertarian types when they say they’re for “free speech.”

What they mean is free speech they agree with. They are absolutely ok with censorship if they disagree with you, particularly if you ever dare criticize them.

 
Back
Top