knapplc
Active member
Knapp isn't the one who said if this was killing young people China would be the target of a World War
He wasn't talking to me. That or he can't spell. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Knapp isn't the one who said if this was killing young people China would be the target of a World War
At this point its not China's fault period. What did they do? No evidence this was intentional. This is a pandemic, a force of nature. You can't blame a hurricane on the African coast because that's where it originates at. Its just crazy.You're deflecting blame from where it belongs (the podium guy) to China. It's not China's fault we haven't even ended the first wave yet.
It turned out that The Spanish Flu that killed 50 million worldwide most likely originated in an American army base in Kansas. Still, I kinda want to kick Spain's a$$. Or Kansas' a$$. I'm not picky about a$$-kicking.
Speaking of competitors: will football players compete in 2020?
The Huskers did their part. Nebraska's combined 148W-29L-5T record against Kansas/Kansas State from 1918 onward is a good a$$-kicking.It turned out that The Spanish Flu that killed 50 million worldwide most likely originated in an American army base in Kansas. Still, I kinda want to kick Spain's a$$. Or Kansas' a$$. I'm not picky about a$$-kicking.
So I understand it is hard to remove politics and everyone wants to blame the U.S. president for everything. Trump can't do anything right per liberals and Obama couldn't do anything right per conservatives. Biden- well everyone agrees he is an idiot. So knowing that bias exists- try to take a level head to this. Fauci was the infectious disease expert who led the task force. I think some like to blame Trump for the U.S. not wearing masks from the get go. But Fauci was the guy who said masks were useless in the beginning. That was Trump's top advisor telling the public that- so I am sure he was telling him the same thing in private.
SO- if China and Japan and all these other countries have been using masks for the commoncold and flu etc for years and had success. How did Fauci not know that? Shouldn't he have known about that data and said Masks Masks and more Masks from day 1? Trump is a business man. Fauci is the expert in his field. I blame the guy who has been studying viruses his whole life. Sure he tried to change course a few weeks ago and say ok everyone do masks.
But he helped shape people's opinions by disregarding masks from the beginning. If he came out and said we gotta wear masks folks and the message was coming from an expert and he was confident in the results of wearing masks from the beginning you wouldnt see such resistance now. The problem is he has changed his recommendations so much- people doubt he knows what the f#&% he is talking about. Maybe he doesn't if he advised against masks but the rest of the world has been doing masks for years.
I'm super certain this is the kind of post @Mavric was talking about when he said to keep the politics out of this as much as possible.
This is purely politics and has nothing to do with football. This needs to go to P&R.
And this from you wasn't?I'm super certain this is the kind of post @Mavric was talking about when he said to keep the politics out of this as much as possible.
This is purely politics and has nothing to do with football. This needs to go to P&R.
Or straight into the garbage can. The entire post is pretty much wrong about pretty much everything.I'm super certain this is the kind of post @Mavric was talking about when he said to keep the politics out of this as much as possible.
This is purely politics and has nothing to do with football. This needs to go to P&R.
And this from you wasn't?
"It's not China's fault the US has fallen on its face in response to this virus. Whatever China did, it affected the whole world the same way it affected America.
That the rest of the world responded to this better than America is a reflection on how poor our leadership is. The guy in front of the podium spouting off about malaria drugs instead of leading a comprehensive national response got us to one fourth of all infections and one fourth of all deaths in the world, not China."
Fauci has made important scientific observations that contributed to the understanding of regulation of the human immune response, and is recognized for delineating the mechanisms whereby immunosuppressive agents adapt to that response. He developed therapies for formerly fatal diseases such as polyarteritis nodosa, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and lymphomatoid granulomatosis. In a 1985 Stanford University Arthritis Center Survey of the American Rheumatism Association, membership ranked Fauci's work on the treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and granulomatosis with polyangiitis as one of the most important advances in patient management in rheumatology over the previous 20 yearsI don’t recall him ever finding a cure, inventing a vaccine
he probably hasnt treated a patient himself in decades
Prove any of what I said is wrong! I will give you 3 talking points. Or do you prefer to just trash the post because you cant argue with it?Or straight into the garbage can. The entire post is pretty much wrong about pretty much everything.
This isn't true at all. Alot of this could easily fit better in P&R and I've argued and agreed with alot of it. The China conversation has nothing to do with college football. Faucis credentials have nothing to do with college football. I could go on but I'm sure you get the point. The thing is this is an incredibly difficult topic to police given how intertwined it is with politics. So people can say things should be moved to P&R and they may be right about that but at the same time that line is very blurred. It's the nature of the beast here.I like how anything the other side cant argue against needs to go to P&R. But when they have something to say they take time to chime in.
I agree for the most part. My one issue I take with that is if it was someone always on topic saying take it to P&R. But when one of the guys taking it political as much as anyone is the one who says take it to P&R because it is in conflict with their belief structure. If it doesn't fall in their echo chamber it should go somewhere else.This isn't true at all. Alot of this could easily fit better in P&R and I've argued and agreed with alot of it. The China conversation has nothing to do with college football. Faucis credentials have nothing to do with college football. I could go on but I'm sure you get the point. The thing is this is an incredibly difficult topic to police given how intertwined it is with politics. So people can say things should be moved to P&R and they may be right about that but at the same time that line is very blurred. It's the nature of the beast here.