Mierin
Donor
BlitzFirst said:Oh I see...because I got called out on generalizing and clarified/changed my argument...or because I committed a fallacy, it means I'm completely wrong eh?
Oddly enough, that again is a fallacy again..it's called Argument from fallacy.
My official stance is that politics and religion would be better completely separate. Churches host voting registration drives, they open their doors as voting sites on elections, they host patriotic events, and encourage patriotism.
I gave examples of Evangelicals and Catholics because they make up almost 65% of Christians in the US and they both align on prolife and against gay marriage; not because I think they need to be dragged through the mud or have a problem with them...both of those issues are hot-button political issues. Churches encourage their members to vote according to the consciences and religion is specifically a conscience trainer and former.
I think that distancing religions from military, state and federal government, and political issues would be something that should be done. There is no place for one inside the other. Whether or not you believe an invisible entity governs all life should not be a prerequisite for becoming president...but currently it is and I find that discouraging on the whole.
Most of the statements you’ve made have been wrong.
But I think most people discussing with you want there to be separation between church and state.