Mizzou / Nebraska Without The Vitriol

[funhusker]

They're most likely going off the overall season thus far.

Big 12 Sports

And by the way...

That's just great!! Nebraska even has to catch up with Iowa State in that poll. We are HORRIBLE!!!

Sorry Cy. :sarcasm

 

[funhusker]

I just hate KU and their stupid faces....

I feel ya dude... I feel the same way about Michigan and some other teams that arent worth mentioning. Comes a time when you learn from the past and move on... Between you and me though (and anyone reading this) I hope Mizzou stomps KU so it puts Nebraska back in contention for the North.

What do you mean "back in conention"... the conference hasn't even started. If/when we beat Mizzou, we will be front runners for the north. I'm not worried about Kansas this year, at least until they show up against a quality squad. They've ONLY played cupcakes.

:restore

LOL... as it stands right now, KU and mizzou are ahead... I know we will get back to the top, but in the meantime I am going to take it anyway we can get it.

What standings are you looking at? Are you sure it not in alphabetical order because no one in the Big 12 has played a conterence game yet.

I dont know what you look at, but there are wins and losses noted on the chart, mizzou and ku are both 3-0, Nebraska 2-1... so both are ahead as it currently stands. Check out Big Red Wrap up sometime, thats how they list the teams in the north.

Correct, however it has nothing to do with our ranking "in the North". Colorado can still win the North

 

[HuskerfaninOkieland]

They're most likely going off the overall season thus far.

Big 12 Sports

And by the way...

That's just great!! Nebraska even has to catch up with Iowa State in that poll. We are HORRIBLE!!!

Sorry Cy. :sarcasm

SHHHHHHH!!!!! We don't want Cy knowing this just yet :lol:

 

[jjamuss]

I just hate KU and their stupid faces....

I feel ya dude... I feel the same way about Michigan and some other teams that arent worth mentioning. Comes a time when you learn from the past and move on... Between you and me though (and anyone reading this) I hope Mizzou stomps KU so it puts Nebraska back in contention for the North.

What do you mean "back in conention"... the conference hasn't even started. If/when we beat Mizzou, we will be front runners for the north. I'm not worried about Kansas this year, at least until they show up against a quality squad. They've ONLY played cupcakes.

:restore

LOL... as it stands right now, KU and mizzou are ahead... I know we will get back to the top, but in the meantime I am going to take it anyway we can get it.

What standings are you looking at? Are you sure it not in alphabetical order because no one in the Big 12 has played a conterence game yet.

:yeah Just because they are listed alphabetically ahead of NU on the ESPN standings doesn't mean that they are "ahead" of us. Nothing is decided until we start the conference schedule. They may not have a loss and we do, but that doesn't mean shitt when it comes to the conference. I still don't know what he's talking about "take it any way we can get it", nothing has taken ANY shape yet. :wtf

Isnt the BCS bowl series determined by total wins and losses, not just conference games/crowns? the season is taking shape, games have been played, some won, some lost. If the nonconf games are not important, then why arent they called preseason games and omitted from the win/loss record?

 

[jjamuss]

I just hate KU and their stupid faces....

I feel ya dude... I feel the same way about Michigan and some other teams that arent worth mentioning. Comes a time when you learn from the past and move on... Between you and me though (and anyone reading this) I hope Mizzou stomps KU so it puts Nebraska back in contention for the North.

What do you mean "back in conention"... the conference hasn't even started. If/when we beat Mizzou, we will be front runners for the north. I'm not worried about Kansas this year, at least until they show up against a quality squad. They've ONLY played cupcakes.

:restore

LOL... as it stands right now, KU and mizzou are ahead... I know we will get back to the top, but in the meantime I am going to take it anyway we can get it.

What standings are you looking at? Are you sure it not in alphabetical order because no one in the Big 12 has played a conterence game yet.

I dont know what you look at, but there are wins and losses noted on the chart, mizzou and ku are both 3-0, Nebraska 2-1... so both are ahead as it currently stands. Check out Big Red Wrap up sometime, thats how they list the teams in the north.

Correct, however it has nothing to do with our ranking "in the North". Colorado can still win the North

so if your logic is correct, why isnt colorado listed first?

 

[funhusker]

I just hate KU and their stupid faces....

I feel ya dude... I feel the same way about Michigan and some other teams that arent worth mentioning. Comes a time when you learn from the past and move on... Between you and me though (and anyone reading this) I hope Mizzou stomps KU so it puts Nebraska back in contention for the North.

What do you mean "back in conention"... the conference hasn't even started. If/when we beat Mizzou, we will be front runners for the north. I'm not worried about Kansas this year, at least until they show up against a quality squad. They've ONLY played cupcakes.

:restore

LOL... as it stands right now, KU and mizzou are ahead... I know we will get back to the top, but in the meantime I am going to take it anyway we can get it.

What standings are you looking at? Are you sure it not in alphabetical order because no one in the Big 12 has played a conterence game yet.

I dont know what you look at, but there are wins and losses noted on the chart, mizzou and ku are both 3-0, Nebraska 2-1... so both are ahead as it currently stands. Check out Big Red Wrap up sometime, thats how they list the teams in the north.

Correct, however it has nothing to do with our ranking "in the North". Colorado can still win the North

so if your logic is correct, why isnt colorado listed first?

Sorry, I didn't mean for this to turn into a back and forth, so I will stop here. My original statement was a reply to your "back in contention for the North" No one in the North is out of contention for the division title, all are 0-0 within the conference.

However, if you meant back in contention for a better "overall" record. Yes NU needs to beat MU.

But bring on ULL first :koolaid2:

 

[jjamuss]

I just hate KU and their stupid faces....

I feel ya dude... I feel the same way about Michigan and some other teams that arent worth mentioning. Comes a time when you learn from the past and move on... Between you and me though (and anyone reading this) I hope Mizzou stomps KU so it puts Nebraska back in contention for the North.

What do you mean "back in conention"... the conference hasn't even started. If/when we beat Mizzou, we will be front runners for the north. I'm not worried about Kansas this year, at least until they show up against a quality squad. They've ONLY played cupcakes.

:restore

LOL... as it stands right now, KU and mizzou are ahead... I know we will get back to the top, but in the meantime I am going to take it anyway we can get it.

What standings are you looking at? Are you sure it not in alphabetical order because no one in the Big 12 has played a conterence game yet.

I dont know what you look at, but there are wins and losses noted on the chart, mizzou and ku are both 3-0, Nebraska 2-1... so both are ahead as it currently stands. Check out Big Red Wrap up sometime, thats how they list the teams in the north.

Correct, however it has nothing to do with our ranking "in the North". Colorado can still win the North

so if your logic is correct, why isnt colorado listed first?

Sorry, I didn't mean for this to turn into a back and forth, so I will stop here. My original statement was a reply to your "back in contention for the North" No one in the North is out of contention for the division title, all are 0-0 within the conference.

However, if you meant back in contention for a better "overall" record. Yes NU needs to beat MU.

But bring on ULL first :koolaid2:

Fair enough... I was just stating what I see on Big Red Wrap up... I hate ESPN and dont care what they report. I agree, the north is wide open... but I think you see my point, we are just on different corners looking down the same road... peace out gangsta... sorry, that KU player on facebook is affecting my speech today.

 

[rcruter]

yes quantrill's raid was in response to the bastard Red Legs murderous sweep thru western and central MO and they murdered women and children indiscriminately, thru country that was not prosouthern at all and I lost relatives too, damn anyone who is proud of being a jayhawker, I was a history major and don't suggest getting too much farther into it. It gets heated.

Back to the previous channel on football, couple of misconceptions: 1 MU had second stringers in when NU kept ganz and the first string in to get something going, instead of playing younger players to gain needed experience. 2 NU more experienced? Where? MU has a baby qb but he had more snaps than Lee, DW had a thousand yd season as the starting rb and the top two wr's for MU are seniors and started as true freshmen played extensively last 3 years, perry was a freshmen all american, Alexander was the starter ahead of Maclin two years ago before he got hurt in IL game then Maclin took over. D is led by sr butkis candidate at LBer, with two juniors flanking, three experienced dlinemen with a rs freshmen who is a freak and secondary hs a lot of experience. Huskers D last year was just too slow to keep up as MU was running a layup drill. I agree with the poster who has said the husker line is not a strength, MU's D line is fast and applying a lot of pressure. Didn't see much at all from VT game as to pressure on qb, Blaine moves very well in the pocket.

I think it will be closer than last year but IMO MU has more talent and experience everywhere, with suh being the exception. As always it's just my opinion, I could be wrong. Always interested in opposing views, as I know most will disagree, please post specifics of where I got it wrong.

 

[catmanzou]

There's a new sheriff in town and his name is MIZZOU. Nebraska was a player in the 20th century but Missouri is the dominator of the 21st century. Get used to it. You guy's are living in the past.

 

[BigRedNV]

There's a new sheriff in town and his name is MIZZOU. Nebraska was a player in the 20th century but Missouri is the dominator of the 21st century. Get used to it. You guy's are living in the past.

Did you come straight over from Tigerboard or make a detour on the way? Being that Misery has played NO one so far this season, that's a pretty bold comment considering a couple beatdowns against patsies and that debacle against BG at home. We shall see my little friend.

 

[catmanzou]

Straight over

 

[fro daddy]

Not surprised by that... <_<

 

[AF Husker Fan]

Straight over

:facepalm:

 

[catmanzou]

I predict the opening line at MU -7.5

 

[caveman99]

I predict the opening line at MU -7.5

Wow put the crack pipe down. VT didn't even have that big of a point spread at home and that is a program ranked much higher than MU.